http://isrctn.com/ 2016
DOI: 10.1186/isrctn13930454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally invasive thoracoscopically-guided right minithoracotomy versus conventional sternotomy for mitral valve repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many surgeons remain concerned that the potential benefits of this technique come at the cost of vascular injuries, high rates of stroke and increased cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross clamp times. The debate between these two approaches is still ongoing as we anticipate the initial results of the UK "mini mitral trial" [1]. With this brief review we will attempt to provide an answer to the question whether there is a clinical equipoise about these two operations by critically reviewing some of the available publications on the subject.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many surgeons remain concerned that the potential benefits of this technique come at the cost of vascular injuries, high rates of stroke and increased cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross clamp times. The debate between these two approaches is still ongoing as we anticipate the initial results of the UK "mini mitral trial" [1]. With this brief review we will attempt to provide an answer to the question whether there is a clinical equipoise about these two operations by critically reviewing some of the available publications on the subject.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%