2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimizing transient microenvironment-associated variability for analysis of environmental anthropogenic contaminants via ambient ionization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optimal electric grid voltage values are significantly lower than conventional voltages used for DART (absolute voltage values within 300 and 400 V), a parameter seldomly optimized in literature. This trend has also been observed in the DART-MS analysis of positive ion species, 34 it being posited that the voltage applied to the electric grid could negatively affect the transmission of ions to the MS inlet. Comparing the mass spectra obtained for GenX between the two end points at −100 and −300 V (Figure S7), the [M − H] − ion is unable to be discriminated from noise at −300 V (m/z = 329) but is readily apparent at −100 V. This voltage played a very minor role in the response of sulfonic acids (Figures 1 and S8); higher response values were obtained with lower absolute voltage but were not statistically significant in the CCD.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Optimal electric grid voltage values are significantly lower than conventional voltages used for DART (absolute voltage values within 300 and 400 V), a parameter seldomly optimized in literature. This trend has also been observed in the DART-MS analysis of positive ion species, 34 it being posited that the voltage applied to the electric grid could negatively affect the transmission of ions to the MS inlet. Comparing the mass spectra obtained for GenX between the two end points at −100 and −300 V (Figure S7), the [M − H] − ion is unable to be discriminated from noise at −300 V (m/z = 329) but is readily apparent at −100 V. This voltage played a very minor role in the response of sulfonic acids (Figures 1 and S8); higher response values were obtained with lower absolute voltage but were not statistically significant in the CCD.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Initial experiments showed no direct desorption of PFAS from SPME devices (fibers and blades) via DART, as the plasma stream was unable to disrupt the ion-exchange interaction between the analytes and the device’s extraction phase. Desorption from SPME devices into DART plasma has been demonstrated in other works, utilizing neutral extraction phases. Therefore, a liquid desorption step was carried out before DART analysis in 80:20 methanol:water. While ammonium hydroxide was optimized as the best additive for SPME desorption for the model analytes when analyzed through LC-MS/MS, ammonium formate has also demonstrated to be effective as a desorption additive when analyzing a larger range of PFAS .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique was able to detect triclosan in raw and treated wastewater in good agreement with LC‐MS. DART‐MS has also been applied to the analysis of pesticides and pharmaceuticals in surface water, though using a solid phase microextraction (SPME) extraction step in an attempt to improve reproducibility by reducing background interferences 114 …”
Section: Applications Of Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…154 Finally, the implementation of different internal standard strategies has been explored with DESI, demonstrating optimal and inappropriate methods for the introduction of internal standards to achieve the best quantitative results. 155 Interestingly, there has been a recent increase in the supplemen- coupled with a range of AIMS techniques, including PESI for the detection of drugs of abuse, 156 both PESI and CBS to monitor drug biotransformations, 157 DART to detect pesticides and pharmaceuticals in surface water 114 and using the SPME device itself as an ESI emitter for direct analysis of biological samples in front of the MS inlet. 158 A primary advantage of AIMS is the potential to take the instrument into the field to perform rapid on-site testing, yet many techniques…”
Section: Technological Advancementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 The innate variability of the transient environment around an ambient ion source led several groups to enclose a conventional SPME fiber during desorption and ionization. The enclosures featured either a thermal desorption unit attached to but independent of the dielectric barrier discharge or DART ion source and MS inlet, 11,12 or a junction for the enclosed DART to itself desorb analyte. 13 In each case, the regulated heat source allowed the SPME analytes to be desorbed at the correct manufacturer-recommended temperature, as opposed to assuming that the DART helium temperature setting would accurately represent the temperature at the sorptive surface.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%