2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.04.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimum-intensity projection for in-depth morphology study of mesiobuccal root

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common root canal configurations were types 3-2, 2-3, 1-3 and 3-3. More complex configurations such 1-2-1-3, 1-2-3-2, 2-3-2-1-2, 2-3-2-3-2 and 3-2-1-2-1 have been also reported in some laboratory studies (14,24,28). In the clinical case reports, type 3-2 was the predominant configuration and it occurred in three forms ( The three root canals are usually located on a straight line and the distance between their orifices ranges from 1 to 2 mm (29,42,46,57).…”
Section: Internal Morphologymentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The most common root canal configurations were types 3-2, 2-3, 1-3 and 3-3. More complex configurations such 1-2-1-3, 1-2-3-2, 2-3-2-1-2, 2-3-2-3-2 and 3-2-1-2-1 have been also reported in some laboratory studies (14,24,28). In the clinical case reports, type 3-2 was the predominant configuration and it occurred in three forms ( The three root canals are usually located on a straight line and the distance between their orifices ranges from 1 to 2 mm (29,42,46,57).…”
Section: Internal Morphologymentioning
confidence: 67%
“…With these advantages, MCT has been used widely in dental field. It was proved that the MCT is a very suitable and effective tool to study and visualize the complex root canal morphologies by various previous studies 1,2,9,10,18…”
Section: Methods For Root Canal Morphology Studymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The current development of MCT technology reproduces voxel resolution up to 1 µm though around 10 - 30 µm resolution of MCT devices were used in root canal studies 17. The images obtained by MCT could be analyzed with various methods, including two-dimensional thin-slab minimum-intensity projection (TS-MinIP) technique and three-dimensional (3D) rendering techniques 18. The objective of this study was to discuss the protocols, advantages, and disadvantages of methodologies used for root canal morphology study and to suggest the 'Gold Standard' method for in-depth root canal morphology study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19] Although µCT has been compared to CBCT and reported to be more precise with up to 2 µm resolution,[2021] however, the limitations include amount of time required and its usage restricted to only ex vivo studies. [2223] Accuracy of CT imaging is well-documented. [24] Major advantages of CBCT over conventional CT scans include X-ray beam limitation,[25] rapid scan time[26] and effective dose reduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%