Proceedings of the ACM Web Science Conference 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2786451.2786452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mining cross-cultural relations from Wikipedia

Abstract: This qualitative and interpretative work aims at approaching Wikipedia's cultural facet from a transdisciplinary view. For this purpose, we set to analyse the existing literature that has dealt with Wikipedia in the generic media and in academic publications on the fields of Artificial Intelligence, Information and Education Sciences and Translation Studies as well. In these works-mostly with a descriptive, empirical or pragmatic approach-Wikipedia is referred to as an online collaborative encyclopaedia that i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies delineated cultures by language, and focused on Wikipedia data. In particular, Laufer and colleagues [33] developed measures of cultural similarity, understanding, and affinity through comparing how food cultures are described by selfand foreign communities. Eom et al [34] applied ranking algorithms to biographical articles and obtained a network of cultural agreement on what historical figures are viewed as important, which includes 24 language points of view.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies delineated cultures by language, and focused on Wikipedia data. In particular, Laufer and colleagues [33] developed measures of cultural similarity, understanding, and affinity through comparing how food cultures are described by selfand foreign communities. Eom et al [34] applied ranking algorithms to biographical articles and obtained a network of cultural agreement on what historical figures are viewed as important, which includes 24 language points of view.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high response rate and pace of coverage in Wikipedia in relation to breaking news [13,14] is another feature that makes Wikipedia a good research platform to address questions related to collective attention. For instance, researchers have analysed Wikipedia edit records to identify and model the most controversial topics in different languages [15,16], to study the European food culture [17] and to highlight entanglement of cultures by ranking historical figures [18]. Wikipedia traffic data have also been used to predict movie box office revenues [19], stock market moves [20], electoral popularity [21] and influenza outbreaks [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both limitations are present in all currentstate-of-the-art studies. However, it is still possible to gather relevant information from this data source despite such limitations [11], [12].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%