“…In terms of evaluation models, many scholars have carried out a lot of research and proposed some theoretical models, such as mutation preference theory [10], AHP-FUZZY theory [11], entropy weight-CTODIM method [12], UMT theory [13], variable weight theory [14], rough set theory [15], Vague set theory [16], etc., which provide a large number of mining programme preference Theoretical basis, but the application of these models for evaluation exists, the evaluation results are extremely vague and uncertain, and there are limitations of unclear definition boundaries and inaccurate human judgement for the preferential evaluation of coal filling mining schemes under buildings, so the above evaluation models are difficult to carry out accurate preferential evaluation of coal filling mining schemes under buildings.…”