2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mismatch between classroom furniture and anthropometric measures in Chilean schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
89
0
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
89
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Castellucci et al (2015) shows that the popliteal height (PH), when compared with stature, is more precise and as such is the most appropriate anthropometric measure for the selection of the furniture's size. It is important to note that the starting point for the sizing of the chair and desk set is the seat height (SH) (Castellucci et al, 2010a(Castellucci et al, , 2015Molenbroek et al, 2003) and the seat height (SH) is defined by the popliteal height (PH) (Fig. 2).…”
Section: The Popliteal Height As a Prescription Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Castellucci et al (2015) shows that the popliteal height (PH), when compared with stature, is more precise and as such is the most appropriate anthropometric measure for the selection of the furniture's size. It is important to note that the starting point for the sizing of the chair and desk set is the seat height (SH) (Castellucci et al, 2010a(Castellucci et al, , 2015Molenbroek et al, 2003) and the seat height (SH) is defined by the popliteal height (PH) (Fig. 2).…”
Section: The Popliteal Height As a Prescription Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations of one-way, in which only a minimum or maximum limit is considered. Equations of two-ways in which the minimum and maximum limits are taken into account (Castellucci et al, 2010a). Of the various (mis)match equations available in the literature and analysed by Castellucci et al (2014b) the ones considered to be the most efficient for chair and desk sizing were considered (Table 2).…”
Section: (Mis)match Equations and Respective Sizing Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations