We revisited three sites in Florida and Puerto Rico that were oiled 23 to 29 years ago, analyzing them and the published literature to determine that mangroves follow a 6 to 25 year recovery cycle. We reviewed response methods and determined that the use of offshore dispersants, the booming of tidal creeks and inlets, the use of onshore sorbents, low-pressure flushing and the manual collection of oily debris provide benefits for recovery at least in the short term. Non-beneficial response efforts that have degraded mangroves include forest cutting, heavy equipment and personnel traffic, tree burning, onshore use of chemicals, and plantings in toxic soil. Perhaps the most detrimental response effort studied was the impoundment of basin forests that has resulted in long-term losses and slow recovery rates. The intertidal use of dispersants has been shown to be beneficial to mangroves, however their use has also caused damages to nearshore environments such as coral reefs. In summary, once the oil has reached sheltered mangrove forests there exist only short-term benefits from traditional response efforts. More likely there are only non-beneficial results compared to natural attenuation. We conclude that the only longterm beneficial response method appears to be a combination of non-intrusive oil collection and booming techniques in heavily oiled, sheltered areas with closely monitored natural recovery in forests more lighly oiled. This should be paired with mitigation programs involving habitat creation either in unoiled areas or in the impact zone following the attenuation of oil and removal of debris from the deteriorating forests.