2020
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(20)31762-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitraclip XTR vs. Pascal Transcatheter Valve Repair System for Edge-to-Edge Repair of Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a recent review on coaptation devices 52 which discussed the limited literature on the outcomes from each of these devices. This showed the first comparative study 53 between the Mitraclip and Pascal techniques, concluding similar results between both. Further comparative studies and studies focusing on the TV are required.…”
Section: Management Of Tricuspid Diseasesupporting
confidence: 63%
“…There is a recent review on coaptation devices 52 which discussed the limited literature on the outcomes from each of these devices. This showed the first comparative study 53 between the Mitraclip and Pascal techniques, concluding similar results between both. Further comparative studies and studies focusing on the TV are required.…”
Section: Management Of Tricuspid Diseasesupporting
confidence: 63%
“…There are currently four categories of TTVI, which are at various developmental stages: coaptation devices (TriClip ® , Pascal ® , Dragonfly ® , FORMA ® ), annuloplasty devices Greater Tricuspid Regurgitation (TRILUMINATE) meeting its primary endpoint. [18][19] Although several non-randomized controlled trials (RCT's) [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] using various types of TTVI devices showed symptomatic relief, the ideal timing of intervention to impact survival remains to be defined. [28][29] The TRILUMINATE study on tricuspid edge-to-edge repair is the only RCT testing a TTVI device.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study published by Braun et al, in which 88 patients were treated with the MitraClip and 32 received the PASCAL system, no differences were observed between the two devices in terms of success of the procedure, the reduction of TR or detachment of the device (11% with MitraClip versus 6% with PAS-CAL). The authors concluded that both devices are similar in terms of efficacy and safety in reducing TR [38].…”
Section: Percutaneous Coaptation Devicesmentioning
confidence: 96%