2014
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2014/10001.4777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed Dentition Space Analysis in Kodava Population: A Comparison of Two Methods

Abstract: Aims: To evaluate the reliability of Tanaka and Johnston and Moyer's (75th percentile) mixed dentition prediction methods in Kodava population sample, to formulate regression equations for predicting the mesiodistal widths of unerupted canines and premolars and to construct probability tables for the Kodava population.Settings and Design: Data was obtained from Kodava subjects visiting the clinics for routine dental check up. Materials and Methods:Dental models of 30 male and 30 female Kodava subjects (age ran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean difference between the actual and predicted values of canines and premolars were clinically and statistically significant. This is in accordance with the literature [7,[10][11][12]17,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Tanaka and Johnston method was very close to the actual values of canine and premolars therefore, this method can be reliable for mixed dentition analysis in their samples as previously reported for Pakistani population [1,27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean difference between the actual and predicted values of canines and premolars were clinically and statistically significant. This is in accordance with the literature [7,[10][11][12]17,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Tanaka and Johnston method was very close to the actual values of canine and premolars therefore, this method can be reliable for mixed dentition analysis in their samples as previously reported for Pakistani population [1,27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Moyer's method at 75th percentile overestimated the actual value of canine and premolars except for the maxillary arch in female subjects as previsouly reported for Kodava population [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…This is in accordance to studies conducted by various researchers. [110111215] This indicates racial and ethnical variations in tooth width for canine and premolars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, the estimation of mesiodistal size was raised for the first time in 1902 based on average tables (1); then, several methods were proposed for this issue by several sources. The method introduced by Tanaka-Johnston was the first standard method whose validity has been proven and it has found a great application (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). Tanaka-Johnston (1974) introduced a probability equation (regression) to predict the mesiodistal width of the cannabis and premolar teeth, in which the total width of the four mandibular incisors was used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copyright (c) the author(s). This is an open access article under CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.abcmed.v.6n.2p.19 tion of space difference with the direct observation of OPG radiography and gypsum cast (10). Tanaka-Johnston method is a relatively simple and non-invasive method for calculating space difference and it is precisely acceptable for both upper and lower dental arches, and for both male and female sexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%