2024
DOI: 10.1109/jtehm.2023.3335608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed Reality and Artificial Intelligence: A Holistic Approach to Multimodal Visualization and Extended Interaction in Knee Osteotomy

Andrea Moglia,
Luca Marsilio,
Matteo Rossi
et al.

Abstract: Objective: Recent advancements in augmented reality led to planning and navigation systems for orthopedic surgery. However little is known about mixed reality (MR) in orthopedics. Furthermore, artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to boost the capabilities of MR by enabling automation and personalization. The purpose of this work is to assess Holoknee prototype, based on AI and MR for multimodal data visualization and surgical planning in knee osteotomy, developed to run on the HoloLens 2 headset. Met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, a total of 195 articles found in both Scopus and PubMed were removed from our sample. Within this group, we identified an article by Krishnamoorthy et al [23] that was listed twice in the Scopus database, as well as instances where the same article appeared with different publication years in the two databases [24][25][26][27][28][29]. After identifying these duplicates, each entry was meticulously reviewed to confirm its uniqueness in terms of content and publication details, ensuring the removal of any erroneous duplicates.…”
Section: Research Stringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, a total of 195 articles found in both Scopus and PubMed were removed from our sample. Within this group, we identified an article by Krishnamoorthy et al [23] that was listed twice in the Scopus database, as well as instances where the same article appeared with different publication years in the two databases [24][25][26][27][28][29]. After identifying these duplicates, each entry was meticulously reviewed to confirm its uniqueness in terms of content and publication details, ensuring the removal of any erroneous duplicates.…”
Section: Research Stringmentioning
confidence: 99%