Mixing SDN and CCN for content-centric Qos aware smart grid architecture

Youssef, Nour El Houda Ben; Barouni, Yosra; Khalfallah, Sofiane; Slama, Jaleleddine Ben Hadj; Driss, Khaled Ben

doi:10.1109/iwqos.2017.7969139

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…"mutual immersive pattern" is to optimize the routing performance of current networks. Some approaches are applied in smart grids and 5G networks [122,126]. Based on the seven-layer structure of ICN, "SDN over ICN" studies have an in-depth optimization of routing.…”

Section: Mutual Immersive Patternmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…-A centralized controller for constructing and managing the ICN overlay [117]. -A SDN-ICN communication architecture for smart grids to improve QoS [122].…”

Section: Routingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The role of SDN controllers was further highlighted. For the paper [122], authors created a new communication architecture for smart grids (SG), which combined SDN and ICN. To improve the content‐centric QoS, the sensing function of SDN was applied in this scene.…”

Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Survey on the scheme evaluation, opportunities and challenges of software defined‐information centric network

Ai,

Zhang,

Zhang

et al. 2023

IET Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As a promising architecture of next‐generation network, software defined‐information centric network (SD‐ICN) inherits the advantages of software defined network (SDN) and information‐centric network (ICN) to enable flexible and fast content retrieval, especially in the current era of artificial intelligence. However, the existing researches mainly focus on a single respective in this field, which motivates in comprehensively providing a forward‐looking guidance and development direction for scholars and engineers. To this end, the latest developments of SD‐ICN is presented. First, the widely‐accepted concepts and impacts on traditional networks are introduced. Second, the shortcomings of SDN and ICN over conventional networks are respectively analyzed to illustrate the necessity of SD‐ICN. Third, based on extensive analysis and deep deliberation, a methodical taxonomy for existing combination studies is proposed. They are divided into SDN over ICN, ICN over SDN, and mutual immersive pattern. Fourth, the performances of three integration categories are compared and the limitations of related works are highlighted. Fifth, the maturity index from six development indicators are evaluated. Further, the maturity and practicality of these schemes are generalized. Based on the above studies and comparisons, the lessons learned by SDN and ICN developments are concluded. Finally, future research directions and opportunities are discussed for the readers.

show abstract

Section: Mutual Immersive Patternmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…-A centralized controller for constructing and managing the ICN overlay [117]. -A SDN-ICN communication architecture for smart grids to improve QoS [122].…”

Section: Routingmentioning

confidence: 99%