Mo2031 A Retrospective, Single Center Experience with the SharkCore Fine Needle Biopsy System: A New Bite into Gastrointestinal Histological Sampling

Comparison of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

“…Four studies were from multicenter data. [4172227] All studies except three[182331] had a cohort size of more than 30 patients. All studies reported clear data on the diagnostic yield except one,[19] where the data were obtained directly from the primary study author.…”

“…All studies reported clear data on the diagnostic yield except one,[19] where the data were obtained directly from the primary study author. Four studies[25283031] had no information on ROSE, another four studies[2242634] were not specific about the use of ROSE, whereas 13 studies[141718192021222327293233] mentioned clearly if ROSE was used or not, and if used what percentage of the study population, it was utilized in. Six studies did not report on adverse events.…”

“…Six studies did not report on adverse events. [21825283134] Six studies[192528313334] were abstracts and rest were original manuscripts. None of the studies had patients lost to follow-up.…”

“…None of the studies had patients lost to follow-up. Overall, 9 studies[1417202122272932] were considered of high quality, 11[218192324252628303334] were of medium quality and one[31] was considered low quality.…”

“…A total of 21 studies with 1632 patients were included in the analysis. [124171819202122232425262728293031323334]…”