2014 Makassar International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (MICEEI) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/miceei.2014.7067334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile applications rating assessments based on users experience perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, after reverse coding several items, -3 represents the most negative answer, In this part of the study, the Cronbach alpha coefficients were 0.87 for both the pragmatic and hedonic evaluations, and 0.91 for attractiveness, indicating high internal consistency (Nunnally, 1994;Zinbarg et al, 2005) and implying successful interpretations of the various items (Pradana & Ferdiana, 2014).…”
Section: Participants and Sample Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Accordingly, after reverse coding several items, -3 represents the most negative answer, In this part of the study, the Cronbach alpha coefficients were 0.87 for both the pragmatic and hedonic evaluations, and 0.91 for attractiveness, indicating high internal consistency (Nunnally, 1994;Zinbarg et al, 2005) and implying successful interpretations of the various items (Pradana & Ferdiana, 2014).…”
Section: Participants and Sample Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Yapılan l taratür çalışmaları göz önüne alındığında, kullanıcı deney m le lg l çok fazla çalışma olmasına rağmen, kullanıcı deney m n n elektron k ortamda ncelenmes le lg l sınırlı kapsamda çalışmaya (Desmet & Hekkert, 2007;Lauqw tz vd., 2008;Hassenzahl vd., 2010;E d 2011;Pradana & Ferd ana, 2014;Sh vd., 2015;Poushneh ve Vasquez-Perraga, 2017;Parades & Hernandes, 2017;Santoso vd., 2017;Schrepp vd., 2017;Treved & Yadav, 2018;Moha d n, 2019) rastlanmıştır. Ayrıca kullanıcı deney m le lg l yazında, bu kavramın hem müşter memnun yet (Pradana & Ferd ana, 2014;Parades & Hernandes, 2017;Santoso vd., 2017;Schrepp vd., 2017) hem de müşter sadakat (E d, 2011;Sh vd., 2015;Treved & Yadav, 2018;Moha d n, 2019) Buna göre, web gel şt r c ler tarafından ortaya koyulan web s teler n kullanan kullanıcılarının kullanıcı deney mler nden yen l kç l k unsuru müşter memnun yet çok düşük fayda sağladığı tesp t ed lm ş, ayrıca web s teler n n tasarımlarının gelecektek müşter memnun yet ne katkı sağlayacağı ler sürülmüştür. Santoso & d ğerler (2017) çalışmasında Alman ve Endonezya' dak öğrenc ler n kullanıcı deney m üzer ndek farklılıklarını tesp t etmeye çalışarak, hang unsurların memnun yete etk ett ğ n bulmaya çalışmışlardır.…”
Section: Kullanıcı Deney M Kavramıunclassified
“…This was done via rating or certification form. Perception on user experience was used to establish the rating for mobile application (Pradana and Ferdiana, 2014). The areas measured are novelty, efficiency, perspicuity, stimulation and dependability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%