Mobile Five Senses Augmented Reality System: Technology Acceptance Study

Rodrigues, João M. F.; Ramos, Célia M. Q.; Pereira, João A. R.; Sardo, João D. P.; Cardoso, Pedro J. S.

doi:10.1109/access.2019.2953003

Cited by 27 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Despite these benefits, the analysis of how users accept and use various innovative technologies is lacking [15]. Technology acceptance is meant to explain technology usage behavior and is associated with behavioral intention [16].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Technology Acceptance of an Interactive Augmented Reality App on Resistive Circuits for Engineering Students

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, we aim to establish the factors that explain the technology acceptance of augmented reality (AR) in students’ engineering education. Technology acceptance of AR apps has been insufficiently investigated. We conceive a theoretical model to explain technology acceptance by relating behavioral intention to use with the variables subjective norm, technology optimism, technology innovativeness, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and attitude toward using. An interactive AR app on electrical circuits was designed to assist students to overcome their difficulties in understanding how electricity works. A theoretical model was hypothesized and tested using structural equation modeling. The study was conducted using a sample of 190 engineering students. The results demonstrate the positive effect of technology optimism and technology innovativeness on perceived usefulness and attitude toward using, respectively. Furthermore, they suggest that attitude toward using is influenced by perceived usefulness but not directly by perceived ease of use. This could mean that students would be willing to use this app if they find it useful and not just easy to use. Finally, the results illustrate that attitude toward using firmly explains behavioral intention to use, which is consistent with the findings in previous studies. These results could guide how academics and higher education centers should approach the incorporation of these technologies in classrooms.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Technology Acceptance of an Interactive Augmented Reality App on Resistive Circuits for Engineering Students

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Referring to Fig. 1 , the technology used in several studies (Kasinathan et al 2017 ; Nisi et al 2018 ; Raptis et al 2018 ; Hammady et al 2020 ) might qualify as AR despite being referred to as MR. As seen in Fig. 3 , AR has been a common immersive technology used in tourism research.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Spatial marking offers a different immersive level in AR. Four studies employed Microsoft HoloLens (Raptis et al 2018 ; Hammady et al 2020 ) and Meta One glasses (Pedersen et al 2017 ; Oh et al 2018 ). These devices take the immersion of AR a step further by overlaying digital objects without a trigger.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Immersive technologies for tourism: a systematic review

Pratisto

Thompson

Potdar

2022

Inf Technol Tourism

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review provides a comprehensive view of immersive technology in tourism by critically analysing prior scholarly work. More specifically, it identifies the recent use of immersive technology in this field and the potential challenges it poses. This systematic review follows PRISMA guidelines and involves four key steps—identifying research questions, defining keywords, selecting studies based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and synthesising results. It focuses on immersive technology in tourism-related peer-reviewed journal articles published from 2012 to 2020. The papers were selected from ten prominent journal databases. Some databases used combinations of search queries but with inclusion and exclusion criteria. This systematic review builds on the existing reviews by adding knowledge regarding state-of-the-art immersive technology usage in tourism and its integration with other technology. This review additionally identifies the potential challenges of implementing immersive technology in tourism. Finally, it presents a set of directions for future research in this space. In practice, the findings from this review can make both software developers and tourism providers aware of the potential of immersive technology in tourism. Software developers might consider appropriate designs that suit such usage, and tourism providers might consider using immersive technology to promote tourism destinations and provide a support system to maximise the benefits of immersive technology.

show abstract

“…In terms of virtual exhibition, Montagud et al discussed the integration of audio description, subtitle, and sign language and other access services into the interface of museum virtual visit and compared the differences in the inclusiveness of different interfaces [ 33 ]. In addition, some studies were conducted in terms of touch and taste, in an attempt to provide more choices for the audience of museum virtual experience [ 34 , 35 ]. All of these works provide more space for the disabled to accept museum virtual exhibition services.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of virtual tour in an online museum: Exhibition of Architecture of the Forbidden City

Nie

2022

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Online virtual museum tours combine museum authority and an academic approach with the diversity and interactivity of online resources; such tours have become an essential resource for online scientific research and education. Many important museums around the world are developing this type of online service. Comprehensive evaluation of such tours is, however, urgently needed to ensure effectiveness. This paper establishes a heuristic evaluation scale based on the literature. Taking the online virtual tour of the Exhibition of Architecture of the Forbidden City as a case study, confirmatory factor analysis was then carried out to improve the scale. Interviews were conducted to discuss and analyze the research results. The developed evaluation scale has four dimensions: authenticity, interaction, navigation, and learning. The results from the case study showed, first, that the exhibition had visual authenticity, but the behavioral authenticity was insufficient; second, the exhibition was generally interactive, but this aspect could be improved by enriching the links; third, the lack of effective navigation design for the exhibit was the main factor affecting experience quality. Fourth, the exhibition was informative and supported learning, but needs further improvement to the quantity and quality of information provided. Finally, the interviews revealed that the online exhibition did not entirely support people of different ages and abilities, so it needs further improvement to be wholly inclusive.

show abstract

Mobile Five Senses Augmented Reality System: Technology Acceptance Study

Cited by 27 publications

References 29 publications

Technology Acceptance of an Interactive Augmented Reality App on Resistive Circuits for Engineering Students

Technology Acceptance of an Interactive Augmented Reality App on Resistive Circuits for Engineering Students

Immersive technologies for tourism: a systematic review

Evaluation of virtual tour in an online museum: Exhibition of Architecture of the Forbidden City

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About