Mobile, Low-Cost, and Large-Scale Immersive Data Visualization Environment for Civil Engineering Applications

Hayden, Shane; Ames, Daniel P.; Turner, D. Clark; Keene, Thomas; Andrus, D.

doi:10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000428

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(4) Besides, common maintenance steps like measuring actual fields (Heidari et al. , 2014), transporting large VR devices (Hayden et al. , 2015) and renting large space for personal training (Ding et al.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(2) Although some studies claimed the realization of the multi-user mode, users were faced with many constraints, such as simultaneous registrations (Li et al. , 2012a, c) and limited distances between each other (Hayden et al. , 2015).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…AEC researchers always spent more than three months building acceptable scenarios of virtual construction sites (Li et al, 2012c;Sacks et al, 2015). (4) Besides, common maintenance steps like measuring actual fields (Heidari et al, 2014), transporting large VR devices (Hayden et al, 2015) and renting large space for personal training (Ding et al, 2019;Davila Delgado et al, 2020b) also large financial and time resources as well.…”

Section: Analysis Of Strategies For Barrier Improvement By Ei-slrmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(1) However, most VR scenarios are only suitable for a single-person training process (Sacks et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2020;Han et al, 2021), without peer interactions. (2) Although some studies claimed the realization of the multi-user mode, users were faced with many constraints, such as simultaneous registrations (Li et al, 2012a, c) and limited distances between each other (Hayden et al, 2015).…”

Section: Analysis Of Strategies For Barrier Improvement By Ei-slrmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

ISM-based analysis of VR-AEC adoption barriers and their inner mechanisms

Chen

Cheng

2022

ECAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose As an emerging visualization technology, virtual reality (VR) falls into the dilemma of having great potential but a low adoption degree in the architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) industry. However, few studies paid attention to studying barriers affecting VR’s adoption and their inner mechanisms. This makes AEC users hard to catch the key points for VR’s implementations. This study aims to get a clear structure of these barriers and provide insights for the improvement.Design/methodology/approach First, 12 major VR-AEC adoption barriers were identified by a systematic literature review and expert interviews (EI). Second, EI and similarity aggregation method were conducted to achieve reliable barrier relationships. Third, interpretive structural modeling was used to establish a multi-level model for barriers. Finally, ten crucial barriers were targeted with a comprehensive strategy framework.Findings The findings help AEC stakeholders get a thorough understanding of the VR-AEC adoption barriers. Besides, the inner mechanism among barriers is revealed and analyzed, followed by a systematic strategy framework. It is anticipated that users could conduct more effective VR-AEC promotions in the future.Originality/value This paper is the first to propose a comprehensive literature review on the VR-AEC adoption barriers. In addition, this paper is novel in building a hierarchy model that explores barriers’ inner mechanism, where structural strategies are proposed.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%