Mobile Technology Use Across Age Groups in Patients Eligible for Cardiac Rehabilitation: Survey Study

Abstract

BackgroundEmerging evidence indicates mobile technology–based strategies may improve access to secondary prevention and reduce risk factors in cardiac patients. However, little is known about cardiac patients’ use of mobile technology, particularly for health reasons and whether the usage varies across patient demographics.ObjectiveThis study aimed to describe cardiac patients’ use of mobile technology and to determine variations between age groups after adjusting for education, employment, and confidence with using mobile technology.MethodsCardiac patients eligible for attending cardiac rehabilitation were recruited from 9 hospital and community sites across metropolitan and rural settings in New South Wales, Australia. Participants completed a survey on the use of mobile technology devices, features used, confidence with using mobile technology, willingness and interest in learning, and health-related use.ResultsThe sample (N=282) had a mean age of 66.5 (standard deviation [SD] 10.6) years, 71.9% (203/282) were male, and 79.0% (223/282) lived in a metropolitan area. The most common diagnoses were percutaneous coronary intervention (33.3%, 94/282) and myocardial infarction (22.7%, 64/282). The majority (91.1%, 257/282) used at least one type of technology device, 70.9% (200/282) used mobile technology (mobile phone/tablet), and 31.9% (90/282) used all types. Technology was used by 54.6% (154/282) for health purposes, most often to access information on health conditions (41.4%, 117/282) and medications (34.8%, 98/282). Age had an important independent association with the use of mobile technology after adjusting for education, employment, and confidence. The youngest group (<56 years) was over 4 times more likely to use any mobile technology than the oldest (>69 years) age group (odds ratio [OR] 4.45, 95% CI 1.46-13.55), 5 times more likely to use mobile apps (OR 5.00, 95% CI 2.01-12.44), and 3 times more likely to use technology for health-related reasons (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.34-8.18). Compared with the older group, the middle age group (56-69 years) was more than twice as likely to use any mobile technology (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.27-4.59) and mobile technology for health-related purposes (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.04-3.53). Participants who had completed high school were twice as likely to use mobile technology (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.45-4.70), mobile apps (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.09-3.84), and mobile technology for health-related reasons (OR 5.09, 95% CI 2.89-8.95) than those who had not completed high school. Associations were also present between participants living in metropolitan areas and mobile technology use (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.07-4.24) and employment and mobile app use (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.44-5.140).ConclusionsMobile technology offers an important opportunity to improve access to secondary prevention for cardiac patients, particularly when modified to suit subgroups. High levels of mobile technology use and health motivation need to be harnessed for secondary prevention.

VA FitHeart, a Mobile App for Cardiac Rehabilitation: Usability Study

“…It has also been suggested that technology training for older adults may need to be geared toward their needs and learning styles [ 44 , 45 ]. As older adults are less likely to use mobile technology than younger adults, interventions and training geared toward older adults may be necessary [ 46 ]. Together, this suggests that interventions for technology-facilitated CR should include opportunities for in-person training of participants on use of the technology, in addition to on-demand help.…”

Facebook Groups for the Management of Chronic Diseases

“…Formative research on older adults with chronic diseases is lacking, with only two studies investigating cardiac patients’ frequency of social media use [ 34 ], and experience and perceptions of using Facebook [ 35 ]. One study assessed how patients with T2DM communicate health information using Facebook [ 36 ].…”

Development and feasibility testing of an avatar‐based education application for patients with acute coronary syndrome

“…Therefore, generalisability of the study result cannot be assumed. In addition, while there is some evidence on technology readiness of people across different age groups, computer readiness among people with cardiac conditions is uncertain (Gallagher et al, 2017;Liu, Stroulia, Nikolaidis, Miguel-Cruz, & Rincon, 2016;Makkonen, Frank, & Koivisto, 2017). Refinement of the education app and subsequent testing of the app in a larger study is warranted.…”