Mobility endowment and entitlements mediate resilience in rural livelihood systems

Abstract

In economically marginal rural areas, choice in livelihood strategy such as decisions to move location mediates levels of individual and household resilience under conditions of environmental change. It is widely recognised that endowments associated with mobility and the entitlement to mobility are unevenly distributed across populations. This paper integrates these insights and conceptualises location choice as a set of mobility endowments and mobility entitlements. Through focussing on endowments and entitlements, the paper explores how choice affects the ability to be mobile and its role in mediating levels of resilience to livelihood shocks associated with changing environmental conditions. The research design involves measuring the impact of different climatic perturbations in rural locations in Anhui Province, China. Mixed methods of rural appraisal, life history interviews, and a household survey generate objective and perceived elements of individual and household responses to risks. These data are augmented by biophysical observations on the nature of the climatic perturbations. The results show that mobility endowments and mobility entitlements are important in determining the impact of mobility on resilience. The life history interview data highlight significant individual agency within the structures that impact on individual choices. Further, individuals and households who possess the ability to decide and to subsequently enact decisions about mobility, are shown to be more resilient compared to other individuals and households that lack such ability. Moreover, households practicing short-term, circular mobility are more resilient than those households that practice long-term mobility. The study confirms that, in these instances, choice and the ability to enact those choices mediates resilience and highlights the implications of location decisions but also the conditions in which those decisions are made.

Migration and Household Adaptation in Climate-Sensitive Hotspots in South Asia

“…In vulnerable areas, migration and the resulting remittances can build the adaptive capacities of the households, particularly when adaption measures incur investments [69]. Furthermore, studies suggest that migration has the potential to enhance household ability to absorb shocks [36,96].…”

Migration influenced by environmental change in Africa: A systematic review of empirical evidence

“…Subsequently, more recent research on the migration-environment nexus has broadened and diversified its focus conceptually and methodologically. Scholars have moved beyond the question of how the environment migration influences the migration decision and ask how migration might contribute to climate-change adaptation (McLeman and Smit 2006;Gemenne and Blocher 2017) and resilience building (Sakdapolrak et al 2016;Rockenbauch and Sakdapolrak 2017;Tebboth, Conway, and Adger 2019). Furthermore, the one-sided focus on mobile populations has been supplemented by research on different forms of immobility, including trapped populations (Zickgraf 2018;Ayeb-Karlsson, Smith, and Kniveton 2018).…”

Can labour migration help households adapt to climate change? Evidence from four river basins in South Asia

“…Emerging theoretical and empirical evidence suggests that migration influences household adaptation through remittance, skill transfer, and transnational and translocal ties (Afifi et al, 2016;Mortreux & Barnett, 2009;Scheffran et al, 2011). It can also help households to absorb climate shocks (Gioli et al, 2014;Tebboth et al, 2019). In climate vulnerable areas, remittance can help in building the adaptive capacities 1 of households, particularly when the adaptation option incurs a significant cash investment by the households (Ng'ang'a et al, 2016).…”