2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobility Management campaigns as part of the transition towards changing social norms on sustainable travel behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One important aim of soft measures is decrease private vehicle dependence and promote sustainable travel (Richter et al 2011;Cairns et al 2008;Taylor and Ampt 2003). To be successful at promoting sustainability, mobility management campaigns need to be centered around social motivation and making sustainable transport behavior the norm (Hiselius and Rosqvist 2016). For those who use their private vehicles, it endeavors to make alternative options more appealing.…”
Section: Mobility Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One important aim of soft measures is decrease private vehicle dependence and promote sustainable travel (Richter et al 2011;Cairns et al 2008;Taylor and Ampt 2003). To be successful at promoting sustainability, mobility management campaigns need to be centered around social motivation and making sustainable transport behavior the norm (Hiselius and Rosqvist 2016). For those who use their private vehicles, it endeavors to make alternative options more appealing.…”
Section: Mobility Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general terms, sustainability in transport is related to balancing current and future economic, social and environmental qualities of transport systems (Steg & Gifford 2005). In recent years, research on sustainable transport behaviour has used insights from psychological theories to provide practical guidelines for the development of personal travel campaigns, awareness raising and promotion of alternative transport options (Heath & Gifford 2002;Bamberg et al 2003;Groot & Steg 2007;Hiselius & Rosqvist 2016). These guidelines have to a large extent relied on financial rewarding schemes and elements of gamification, which focus on individual reasoned action in order to achieve major social change (Barr & Prillwitz 2014;Te Brömmelstroet 2014).…”
Section: Travel Behaviour In Research and Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of this knowledge, the question remains on how normative information should be. A number of studies express the importance of normalizing sustainable travel so that individuals and society sees the unsustainable alternative as differentnot the contrary (Oinas-kukkonen, 2010; Hiselius and Rosqvist, 2016). Also, the Theory of Planned Behaviour sets the social norm as a factor individuals take into account in their choice of behaviour, indicating that it would be a good idea to influence these via normative information (Bamberg et al, 2003).…”
Section: Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has shown that technology, innovation and economic factors alone will not suffice to achieve the climate and environmental objectives set for the transport sector (Nilsson et al, 2013). Sustainable development also requires changes in our behaviour and a development in which car travel decreases (Hiselius and Rosqvist, 2016). According to Anable et al (2006) there is often a gap between individuals' concerns of climate change and the actual travel behaviour that is performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%