1991
DOI: 10.1097/00005344-199101000-00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mode of Action of a New Class IC Drug (ORG 7797) Against Atrial Fibrillation in Conscious Doges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of WL for the inducibility and stability of AF was initially studied by Rensma et al 10 and Kirchhof et al 11 They measured WL during pacing in the absence of AF. As shown in their studies, the antifibrillatory effects of several class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs were related to a prolongation by the minimal WL rather than a more pronounced effect on RP than on CV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of WL for the inducibility and stability of AF was initially studied by Rensma et al 10 and Kirchhof et al 11 They measured WL during pacing in the absence of AF. As shown in their studies, the antifibrillatory effects of several class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs were related to a prolongation by the minimal WL rather than a more pronounced effect on RP than on CV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relation of Interruption of Atrial Flutter to the Wavelength Hypothesis Traditionally, it has been thought that the wavelength of excitation, defined as the product of the refractory period multiplied by the conduction velocity, has been very important in understanding the effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on reentrant rhythms. [41][42][43][44] In fact, over the years, and as summarized recently,44 it has been postulated that the effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on reentrant rhythms could be explained by their effects on the wavelength (ie, their effects on the product of conduction velocity and the refractory period). This hypothesis assumes (1) that any drug-induced slowing of conduction velocity that may occur is uniform; (2) that drug interruption of the reentrant rhythm occurs when a drug causes an increase in the wavelength such that the circulating reentrant wave front encounters tissue in the reentrant circuit that is not excitable because it is still refractory; and (3) that a drug that decreases conduction velocity (and thereby prolongs the cycle length of the reentrant rhythm -in our case, atrial flutter) is less likely or, in fact, unlikely to terminate the reentrant rhythm because it decreases the wavelength and therefore the degree of interaction between the head of the reentrant excitation wave front and the tail of refractoriness of the previous reentrant excitation wave front.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial studies suggested that AF termination was attributable to increased wavelength. [3][4][5]38 However, more recent work has shown that class I drugs can terminate AF while decreasing wavelength. 6,25 The experimental evidence is difficult to interpret because of accessory drug actions, including important K ϩ -channel blockade.…”
Section: Theoretical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%