2006
DOI: 10.1093/jigpal/jzk020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model-Baded Abduction via Dual Resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Example 3. Abduction via semantic tableau [14] and resolution [39] generates a cutting, and then an explanatory relation. We illustrate this fact for abduction via semantic tableau in the framework of the propositional logic 5 .…”
Section: Definition 5 (Explanatory Relation)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example 3. Abduction via semantic tableau [14] and resolution [39] generates a cutting, and then an explanatory relation. We illustrate this fact for abduction via semantic tableau in the framework of the propositional logic 5 .…”
Section: Definition 5 (Explanatory Relation)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we extend to the semantics of C-structures the δ-resolution calculus, introduced in (Soler-Toscano, 2005) and later developed in (Soler-Toscano et al, 2006b) for propositional logic. We will use δ-resolution to obtain explanatory hypotheses for a certain set of formulae.…”
Section: Search Through δ-Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The added novelty is that we combine two calculi used previously, but separately, to solve abductive problems. These calculi are based on semantic tableaux and resolution (Reyes-Cabello et al, 2006;Soler-Toscano et al, 2006b). Our approach is specially useful and hopefully interesting for abductive applications in contexts with finite domains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By working with classical consequence relation, semantic tableaux method has been used in Aliseda (1997), Aliseda (2006) and Reyes et al (2006) and dual resolution is the calculus for abduction introduced Soler et al (2006). On the other hand,  K ,  W and  R , defined as supraclassical consequence relations, verify modus ponens and deduction theorem, and such first and second ⊥-rules could be settled.…”
Section: Consistent Explicative Abductionmentioning
confidence: 99%