2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model for estimating the energy yield of a high concentrator photovoltaic system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When further comparing the performance of the HCPV systems in the present investigation to the previously reported PV power plants with different techniques in Table 1, the present HCPV system realizes an annually system efficiency (η) of 18.9% (using the measured DNI intensity as the reference), which values are comparable to the previous HCPV power plant reported in [16]. The annual averaged performance ratio of the present HCPV system has been calculated to be 79.7%, which value is lower than the HCPV system reported in [16]. The high system efficiency of the HCPV system is mainly because of the high conversion efficiency of the multi-junction solar cell chip (39%) as compared to the conventional crystalline silicon solar cell (<20%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…When further comparing the performance of the HCPV systems in the present investigation to the previously reported PV power plants with different techniques in Table 1, the present HCPV system realizes an annually system efficiency (η) of 18.9% (using the measured DNI intensity as the reference), which values are comparable to the previous HCPV power plant reported in [16]. The annual averaged performance ratio of the present HCPV system has been calculated to be 79.7%, which value is lower than the HCPV system reported in [16]. The high system efficiency of the HCPV system is mainly because of the high conversion efficiency of the multi-junction solar cell chip (39%) as compared to the conventional crystalline silicon solar cell (<20%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Nevertheless, due to a lack of information on the AOD data for the local area, the influence from PW to the performance of the HCPV system cannot be quantified for the present case. The present investigation also shows that the HCPV module efficiency linearly reduces with an increasing air mass when AM > 2, while the influence of air mass can be considered negligible when AM < 2, which is in agreement with the previous reports [16,31].…”
Section: Influence On Energy Conversion By Environmental Parameterssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations