1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1018-3639(18)30700-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model Plate-Load Tests on Collapsible Soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 2D modelling results in smaller values of settlement versus load when compared to 3D modelling. The ultimate bearing potential for each curve was determined from the intersection of the initial tangent with the steeper tangent [52]. As is known, the maximum stress that soil can support directly before shear failure is the ultimate bearing capacity.…”
Section: Effect Of Immersion On Load-settlement Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2D modelling results in smaller values of settlement versus load when compared to 3D modelling. The ultimate bearing potential for each curve was determined from the intersection of the initial tangent with the steeper tangent [52]. As is known, the maximum stress that soil can support directly before shear failure is the ultimate bearing capacity.…”
Section: Effect Of Immersion On Load-settlement Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 34 ] work has utilised two concepts to evaluate the benefits of reinforced soil foundation, for example, the bearing capacity ratio (BCR) and settlement reduction ratio (SRR). BCR is defined as the ratio of the bearing capacity of the reinforced soil foundation to that of unreinforced soil foundation whereas SRR is defined as the ratio of the reduction in footing settlement based on reinforcement to the settlement of unreinforced soil foundation at a constant surface pressure [ 35 ]. BCR is given as: …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%