Modeling acuity for optotypes varying in complexity

Abstract

Watson and Ahumada (2008) described a template model of visual acuity based on an ideal-observer limited by optical filtering, neural filtering, and noise. They computed predictions for selected optotypes and optical aberrations. Here we compare this model's predictions to acuity data for six human observers, each viewing seven different optotype sets, consisting of one set of Sloan letters and six sets of Chinese characters, differing in complexity (Zhang, Zhang, Xue, Liu, & Yu, 2007). Since optical aberrations for the six observers were unknown, we constructed 200 model observers using aberrations collected from 200 normal human eyes (Thibos, Hong, Bradley, & Cheng, 2002). For each condition (observer, optotype set, model observer) we estimated the model noise required to match the data. Expressed as efficiency, performance for Chinese characters was 1.4 to 2.7 times lower than for Sloan letters. Efficiency was weakly and inversely related to perimetric complexity of optotype set. We also compared confusion matrices for human and model observers. Correlations for off-diagonal elements ranged from 0.5 to 0.8 for different sets, and the average correlation for the template model was superior to a geometrical moment model with a comparable number of parameters (Liu, Klein, Xue, Zhang, & Yu, 2009). The template model performed well overall. Estimated psychometric function slopes matched the data, and noise estimates agreed roughly with those obtained independently from contrast sensitivity to Gabor targets. For optotypes of low complexity, the model accurately predicted relative performance. This suggests the model may be used to compare acuities measured with different sets of simple optotypes.

Predicting Through-Focus Visual Acuity with the Eye’s Natural Aberrations

“…There are currently very few image quality metrics that can be easily translated to clinical outcome measures. 21,34 The model outlined in this study uses an outcome metric based on logMAR acuity, a measurement familiar to all clinicians and contact lens designers, and one where the relative impact of changes caused by a lens design can be easily interpreted. Moreover, the analysis is performed using a number of Zemax-based eye models, each designed to replicate the biometry of an individual human eye, providing mean results from a multitude of individual analyses, rather than a single analysis of a model built to represent the mean biometry of a population.…”

“…A score is given from 0 to 1000 on how closely the evaluation letter matches the perfect letter (1000 being an exact match). 21,34,35 Fig. 1 shows an example of a perfect E and geometrically convolved evaluation E.…”

Critical band masking reveals the effects of optical distortions on the channel mediating letter identification

“…Cross-correlation-based template matching models have been shown to have a high correlation with acuity measures (Watson and Ahumada, 2008, 2012, for example). We used a similar technique that we have previously shown to correlate well with empirical measures of performance in letter-based tasks (Young et al, 2011, 2013a,b).…”

Use of a cubic phase plate as solution for moderate astigmatism: preliminary study

“…2c). Con el fin de incluir la mejora de contraste asociado al procesado neuronal y simular parte del trabajo del cerebro, filtramos las imágenes registradas con la función de transferencia neural (NTF) [14]:…”

“…con valores: f0=33.3573 f1=5.37916 y a=0.923853 γ= 3.48 ciclos/grado y λ = 13.57 ciclos/grado [14,15].…”