Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C)
DOI: 10.1109/robot.1999.774051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and classification of rough surfaces using CTFM sonar imaging

Abstract: Abstmct-The typical use of ultrasonic sensors has been limited to estimation of the location of targets in a robot workspace. C T F M sonars have also been used successfully in classifying primitive targets. In this paper the classification is extended to include textures typical of these found in pathways the robot m a y need to follow or identify. The pathway classes examined are considered t o be plane surfaces of various roughness corresponding to hard smooth poor, carpet, and asphalt. Each class is modele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their measurements included all the energy in the echo (both specular and diffuse). Probert Smith and co-workers [6]- [8] also used a CTFM system transmitting at an angle to the surface. They used a set of three features: energy in the specular region, energy in the diffuse region, and range of bins in the diffuse region above a threshold.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their measurements included all the energy in the echo (both specular and diffuse). Probert Smith and co-workers [6]- [8] also used a CTFM system transmitting at an angle to the surface. They used a set of three features: energy in the specular region, energy in the diffuse region, and range of bins in the diffuse region above a threshold.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Politis and Probert Smith [6], [7] used CTFM sensors angled to the surface to measure roughness. Using the distribution of energy between the specular and diffuse components of the echo [two-dimensional (2-D) feature vector], they were able to distinguish between six indoor surfaces typical of pathways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The echo signal can be described as: SR(t)=Aβ(λ,R,θ)ST(tτ)where β ( λ , R , θ ) is an attenuation factor related to the wavelength λ , the range R , and the incident angle θ . The amplitude of the echo also depends on the surface characteristic of the reflector [6,12]. To focus on the range finding function of the system, it is assumed that the targets are strong reflectors and are within the observable area.…”
Section: Ctfm System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With its advantages of high precision, broadband, high signal-to-noise ratio, and high quantity of information, the CTFM sonar is capable of detecting multiple targets, classifying primitive indoor targets [11], and even recognizing complex targets such as rough surfaces [12], leafy plants [13], and human faces [14]. However, most of the applications of a CTFM sonar are carried out under stationary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to other systems classifying texture (Bozma and Kuc 1994;Kuc 1997a) that require greater precision. Early work was presented in Politis and Probert (1999). Success rates of more than 99% were achieved using only a single measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%