Modeling and Configuration of Process Variants for On-Boarding Customers to IT Outsourcing

Rule- and context-based dynamic business process modelling and simulation

“…• A1 = CEVICHE, (Hermosillo et al, 2010a,b), where implementation includes some examples of code, • A2, (Eijndhoven et al, 2008), where implementation includes prototype and case study with some examples of code, • A3, (Bui et al, 2013), where implementation includes prototype with test cases from the homecare domain, • A4, (Yao et al, 2012), where implementation includes prototype, print screens, from on-boarding customers to IT outsourcing, • A5, (Döhring et al, 2010), where implementation includes prototype and print screens, • A6 = PROVOP, (Hallerbach et al, 2008c(Hallerbach et al, ,b,a, 2010, where implementation includes prototype and print screens from automotive and healthcare industries,…”

“…As can be seen from Table 3, historical data is used only in a few approaches, like in (Yao et al, 2012), PROVOP and (Boukhebouze et al, 2011). But the usage of historical data is weak.…”

“…Therefore, it is not clear which part of the method/approach is implemented. Though authors like Bui et al (2013), Yao et al (2012), Döhring et al (2010), PROVOP and Boukhebouze et al (2011) present prototypes and some print screens that enhance the proposed approaches, no author presents a process simulation.…”

“…external or internal, since, in the authors' analysed cases, it suffices to have one type of context -though not all authors specify how to define context. The common description of a context, also used by Bui et al (2013) and Yao et al (2012), consists of variables and rules.…”

“…Comparison of the eleven approaches on rule-and context-based DBP modelling and simulation The authorsBui et al (2013),Yao et al (2012) identify user-context, which can be described by a set of variables characterizing the user's needs (i.e. time of taking medications, blood pressure, etc.…”