2007
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2007)133:1(39)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Depth-Averaged Velocity and Boundary Shear in Trapezoidal Channels with Secondary Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Knight et al [17] suggested that more accurate results can be obtained by using more divided panels in lateral distribution methods (LDM), because of the complex secondary flow distribution in the single channel. In this paper, the proposed model is also a two-dimensional LDM method (outlined in Section 4) applied in a meandering compound channel and therefore, each of the seven test sections (CS1 to CS7) is d ivided into several panels to obtain accurate lateral depth-averaged velocity distributions along a meander.…”
Section: Region Divided Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knight et al [17] suggested that more accurate results can be obtained by using more divided panels in lateral distribution methods (LDM), because of the complex secondary flow distribution in the single channel. In this paper, the proposed model is also a two-dimensional LDM method (outlined in Section 4) applied in a meandering compound channel and therefore, each of the seven test sections (CS1 to CS7) is d ivided into several panels to obtain accurate lateral depth-averaged velocity distributions along a meander.…”
Section: Region Divided Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to demonstrate the advantages of the proposed approach over previous calibration attempts, a comparison was made with two examples taken from Knight et al (2007). Figure 13 shows the depth-averaged velocity and boundary shear stress distributions for two smooth homogeneous test cases along with the calculated values of the four objective functions (Equations (13) - (16) …”
Section: Preliminary Parameter Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abril and Knight (2004) and Knight et al (2007) demonstrated that the λ value has no significant influence on the SKM prediction. Therefore, in this study, a constant value λ mc = 0.07 proposed by Knight et al (2004) was used in the main channel panel.…”
Section: Calibration For Skm Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also showed that the secondary flow term may be assumed to be proportional to the gravitational term and suggested the secondary flow coefficient (k) as a proportionality constant. Knight et al (2007) analysed the modelling of the boundary shear in trapezoidal channels through investigating the effect of secondary flows on the boundary shear. Liao and Knight (2007) suggested a simple procedure for determining the analytic stage-discharge relationship, involving all three key parameters in SKM model, f, λ, and Г.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%