Modeling driver-vehicle interaction in automated driving

Abstract

In automated vehicles, the collaboration of human drivers and automated systems plays a decisive role in road safety, driver comfort, and acceptance of automated vehicles. A successful interaction requires a precise interpretation and investigation of all influencing factors such as driver state, system state, and surroundings (e.g., traffic, weather). This contribution discusses the detailed structure of the driver-vehicle interaction, which takes into account the driving situation and the driver state to improve driver performance. The interaction rules are derived from a controller that is fed by the driver state within a loop. The regulation of the driver state continues until the target state is reached or the criticality of the situation is resolved. In addition, a driver model is proposed that represents the driver’s decision-making process during the interaction between driver and vehicle and during the transition of driving tasks. The model includes the sensory perception process, decision-making, and motor response. The decision-making process during the interaction deals with the cognitive and emotional states of the driver. Based on the proposed driver-vehicle interaction loop and the driver model, an experiment with 38 participants is performed in a driving simulator to investigate (1) if both emotional and cognitive states become active during the decision-making process and (2) what the temporal sequence of the processes is. Finally, the evidence gathered from the experiment is analyzed. The results are consistent with the suggested driver model in terms of the cognitive and emotional state of the driver during the mode change from automated system to the human driver.

Effect of Human Response on the Effectiveness of Advanced Vehicle Control Systems (HRAVCS)

“…At the limit of 0, for both λ and ω, equation (17) will reduce to equation (16). This is due to the zero probability of failure.…”

“…At ΔTprocessing = 0 and ΔTresponse = 0, and Pprocessing failure = 0  Equation (15) becomes equation (16).…”

“…Good HMI device design is a difficult engineering endeavor. The development of an interface that is easy to use, intuitive, and ergonomic requires extensive knowledge [15], [16], [17]. Designing HMI should be based on the following requirements:…”

A multimodal driver monitoring benchmark dataset for driver modeling in assisted driving automation

“…CLARION, on the other hand, outlines a cognitive architecture where modules for perception, action, motor functions, emotion, and goal synergistically interact to shape driver behavior. Considering insights from all three models results in a driver model that underpins the selection of pertinent driver state factors 25 . Human information processing takes place in three stages: sensory perception, decision-making, and motor response.…”

“…Human information processing takes place in three stages: sensory perception, decision-making, and motor response. The factors that determine the driver state are visual attention for sensory perception, emotion, attention, and workload for decision-making, and the driver’s activity and the position of body parts for motor response 25 . Table 2 offers a comprehensive overview of these driver state factors, the associated measuring sensors, and potential scaling features.…”