2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2006.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of a space heating and cooling system with seasonal energy storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained for the periodic condition of the system shown in Figs. 7-10 are in good agreement with results in [13,14,18].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results obtained for the periodic condition of the system shown in Figs. 7-10 are in good agreement with results in [13,14,18].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…COP HP and overall exergy efficiency of the studied system are calculated as 2.65% and 41.35%, respectively. Zhang et al [13] analyzed a model of a space heating and cooling system of a surface water pond that has an insulating cover, which serves as the heat source in the winter and heat sink in the summer. They considered three running modes to analyze the interaction of the seasonal heat charge and discharge for heating and refrigeration individually.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment of system performance from various designs and operations has in previous studies been made by computational simulations or experimental tests [1][2][3][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], Inalli and Esen [13] present a study similar to this paper.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…This would be favourable for the COP of a heat pump during the heating season. Therefore, increasing storage volume improved the COP of the heat pump by reducing the compressor work [123]. However, when the storage volume was large enough, then the effect of volume on COP of the heat pump became negligible [124].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%