2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11265-014-0923-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Resolution of Resources Contention in Synchronous Data Flow Graphs

Abstract: Synchronous Data Flow graphs are widely adopted in the designing of streaming applications, but were originally formulated to describe only how an application is partitioned and which data are exchanged among different tasks. Since Synchronous Data Flow graphs are often used to describe and evaluate complete design solutions, missing information (e.g., mapping, scheduling, etc.) has to be included in them by means of further actors and channels to obtain accurate evaluations. To address this issue preserving t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Hyun et al [11] proposed a decentralized Multi-Robot Task Allocation (MRTA) approach, taking into account the residual expendable resources of robots and their limited communication range. Lattuada and Ferrandi [12] modeled the resolution of resources contention in synchronous data flow graphs by adding a function member and communication channel. de Blanche and Lundqvist [13] proposed addressing characterization methods for memory contention aware co-scheduling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Hyun et al [11] proposed a decentralized Multi-Robot Task Allocation (MRTA) approach, taking into account the residual expendable resources of robots and their limited communication range. Lattuada and Ferrandi [12] modeled the resolution of resources contention in synchronous data flow graphs by adding a function member and communication channel. de Blanche and Lundqvist [13] proposed addressing characterization methods for memory contention aware co-scheduling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%