2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12597-017-0315-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the criteria for selection of suppliers towards green aspect: a case in Indian automobile industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the results shown in Table 12, the top five sub-criteria are cleaner production, energy/material saving, green package, remanufacturing, and environmental management system, with global weights of 0.249, 0.214, 0.130, 0.120, and 0.065, respectively. The results of this study are consistent with the findings of previous studies (Diabat et al 2013;Sahu et al 2016;Mathiyazhagan et al 2018;Lee et al 2009;Genovese et al 2013;Sun and Zhu 2018;Lee et al 2009; 3rd Uygun and Dede 2016;Qin et al 2017;Demir et al 2018). Furthermore, the green supplier GS3 is the best supplier with a score of 0.324 with respect to the final scores with respect to Table 12.…”
Section: Cr Consistency Ratiosupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the results shown in Table 12, the top five sub-criteria are cleaner production, energy/material saving, green package, remanufacturing, and environmental management system, with global weights of 0.249, 0.214, 0.130, 0.120, and 0.065, respectively. The results of this study are consistent with the findings of previous studies (Diabat et al 2013;Sahu et al 2016;Mathiyazhagan et al 2018;Lee et al 2009;Genovese et al 2013;Sun and Zhu 2018;Lee et al 2009; 3rd Uygun and Dede 2016;Qin et al 2017;Demir et al 2018). Furthermore, the green supplier GS3 is the best supplier with a score of 0.324 with respect to the final scores with respect to Table 12.…”
Section: Cr Consistency Ratiosupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As a result, GSS can be assumed a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problem. Recently, many researchers have paid attention to this issue (Demir et al 2018;Mathiyazhagan et al 2018;Chatterjee et al 2018;Wu et al 2019). Further, a number of literature review on GSS (Govindan et al 2015;Malviya and Kant 2015;de Oliveira et al 2018;Tseng et al 2019) has remarkably increased in recent years, which points out the importance of this issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DEA was used to identify the best combination of vendor specification on the performance parameter to select twenty-seven industrial robots. This method widely used in supplier selection in many industry such as automotive [72], telecommunication [73] and manufacturing firm [74]. Based on article reviewed by Ho et al [75], almost 18% article was used DEA as a tool for supplier selection.…”
Section: Data Envelopment Analysis (Dea)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) uhas also been used in criteria selection. Only AHP has been used in the criteria selection, such as Lin and Lin (2008), Xu, Kumar, Shankar, Kannan and Chen (2013), Felice, Deldoost and Faizollahi (2015), Patra and Dash (2015), and Mathiyazhagan, Sudhakar and Bhalotia (2018). The AHP steps are shown in a simplified form in Figure 9.…”
Section: Overview Of Criteria Selection Using Mcdmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criteria and sub criteria are then weighted using AHP. Mathiyazhagan et al (2018) defined green criteria based on expert judgment. Questionnaires were given to 15 car manufacturers to get their opinions.…”
Section: Overview Of Criteria Selection Using Mcdmmentioning
confidence: 99%