2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3991(01)00107-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the electron field emission from carbon nanotube films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison, severe shielding effect (s is about 0.06) of the field emission properties for densely aligned carbon nanotubes has been studied in Ref. [15]. Therefore, it can be concluded the diamond cone density used in our experiment is quite advantageous for decreasing shielding effect.…”
Section: Results and Discussesmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…For comparison, severe shielding effect (s is about 0.06) of the field emission properties for densely aligned carbon nanotubes has been studied in Ref. [15]. Therefore, it can be concluded the diamond cone density used in our experiment is quite advantageous for decreasing shielding effect.…”
Section: Results and Discussesmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…6. Moreover, the nonlinearity of the FN plots of four samples can also be explained by Filip model (Filip et al, 2001). It is also proposed that the morphology and the growth density of the AlN nanostructures determine their FE behaviors to a great extent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It can be observed in Table 2 that the nanorod and the nanocrater with lower density have higher field enhancement factor β than the nanocones with higher density. Combined the nonlinearly (low and high electric field)exhibited in their FN plots with the screen effect, Filip model was more appropriate for these samples (Filip et al, 2001), which can be expressed as follows:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculation difficulties in these numerical methods arise due to the large nanotube aspect ratio and very long distance between cathode and anode in comparison with emitter height. Usually, these numerical results were generalized and simple fitting formulas of field enhancement factor for individual nanotube (Edgcombe & Valdrè, 2001;Edgcombe & Valdrè, 2002;Shang et al, 2007), for nanotube in space between parallel cathode and anode planes (Bonard et al, 2002a;Filip et al, 2001;Nilsson et al, 2002;Smith et al, 2005), and for a nanotube surrounded by neighboring nanotubes with a screening effect (Jo et al, 2003;Glukhova et al, 2003;Nilsson et al, 2000;Wang et al, 2005) were suggested. The main problem for such algebraic fitting formulas is the lack of a definitive proof of their accuracy.…”
Section: Electric Field and Field Enhancement Factor In Diode Configumentioning
confidence: 99%