2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(03)00565-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the microstructure–mechanical property relationship for a 12Cr–2W–V–Mo–Ni power plant steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation is in a reasonable agreement with the experimental results obtained previously for other, non-HEA bcc metallic materials such as different steels, Nb and Ta. For these materials  varies between 0.17 and 0.60[35][36][37][38]. The relatively low value of  for the present HEA material is in line with the low strain hardening observed on the true stress -true strain curve.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…This observation is in a reasonable agreement with the experimental results obtained previously for other, non-HEA bcc metallic materials such as different steels, Nb and Ta. For these materials  varies between 0.17 and 0.60[35][36][37][38]. The relatively low value of  for the present HEA material is in line with the low strain hardening observed on the true stress -true strain curve.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…According to [23], strengthening caused by the refinement of microstructure with martensite lath boundaries in 9-12%Cr martensitic steels is the predominating strengthening mechanism. On the other hand, a slightly higher decrease by approx.…”
Section: Microstructure and Properties Of P92 Steel After Long-term Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) In the case of examined ODS steel the solid solution strengthening mainly depends on the amounts of Cr and W and may be evaluated as [32]:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%