2004
DOI: 10.1007/s11038-005-9017-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Sporadic Meteoroid Background Cloud

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, 2P/Encke is the largest contributor with approximately 50% of the total, followed by 79P/duToit-Hartley. The asteroidal contribution in our model hovers around 4%, which is consistent with the results from the ESA model (Dikarev et al, 2004).…”
Section: The Low-velocity Flux At Earthsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surprisingly, 2P/Encke is the largest contributor with approximately 50% of the total, followed by 79P/duToit-Hartley. The asteroidal contribution in our model hovers around 4%, which is consistent with the results from the ESA model (Dikarev et al, 2004).…”
Section: The Low-velocity Flux At Earthsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Eventually, perturbations accumulate and disperse the meteoroid stream, the original close orbital relationship between individual meteoroids becoming difficult to determine. allels in some ways that of the ESA meteoroid model (Landgraf et al, 2001;Dikarev et al, 2002Dikarev et al, , 2004. In fact, the ESA meteoroid model incorporates more observational constraints than our own, including many obtained by spacecraft, while we rely only on Earth-bound radar measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to predict the IDP fluxes on CDA between Jupiter and Saturn, we adopted the interplanetary meteoroid model by Divine [1993]. More recently developed models by Staubach et al [1997] and Dikarev et al [2005] were not based on any data acquired beyond Jupiter, and thus their numbers should be taken cautiously in the region under consideration. Figure 12 shows how drastically the frequent spacecraft orientation maneuvers affect the instrument sensitivity, the magnitude of variation reaches four orders of magnitude!…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asteroids and short‐period comets of the Jupiter family were found to be the major source of dust in the inner solar system [ Dermott et al , 1992; Liou et al , 1995]. Although their relative contribution is still a matter of debate, the large number of in situ measurements lead to quite a reliable modeling of the dust populations forming the zodiacal cloud inside 5 AU [ Divine , 1993; Staubach et al , 2001; Dikarev et al , 2005].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inside and outside 1au the data are scarcer, although various models exist and are in use by NASA and ESA [e.g. [40][41][42][43][44]. The differential size distribution slope of particles larger than ∼100 µm was found to be steeper than −4, so that the mass density is dominated by particles ∼100 µm in radius.…”
Section: Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%