2017
DOI: 10.26724/2079-8334-2017-3-61-73-76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Using Regression Analysis of Sonographic Parameters of Kidneys Depending on the Features of the Size of Practical Healthy Women With Mesomorphic Somatotype

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies [4,27,28] we determined that from 16 possible sonographic parameters of the kidneys, based on the anthropometric and somatotypological indices in practically healthy women of the mesomorphic somatotype, 7 reliable models with a determination coefficient from 0.607 to 0.641 were constructed; in women of ectomorphic somatotype -all 16 models with a determination coefficient from 0.607 to 0.973; in women endo-mesomorphic somatotype -14 models with a determination coefficient from 0.672 to 0.912. The most frequently constructed models included: women with mesomorphic somatotypecircumferential body dimensions (29.8%) and cephalometric indexes (19.1%); in women with ectomorphic somatotype body diameters (24.2%), body girth sizes (20.9%), cephalometric indices (19.8%) and thickness of skin and fat folds (14.3%); in women of the endo-mesomorphic somatotype, the cephalometric indexes (to the right kidney 24.2%, to the left kidney 15.6%), body diameters (to the right kidney 24.2%, to the left kidney 17.8%) and the circumferential body size (to the right kidney 24.2%, to left kidney 22.2%), and also only to the left kidney thickness of skin and fat folds (17.8%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In previous studies [4,27,28] we determined that from 16 possible sonographic parameters of the kidneys, based on the anthropometric and somatotypological indices in practically healthy women of the mesomorphic somatotype, 7 reliable models with a determination coefficient from 0.607 to 0.641 were constructed; in women of ectomorphic somatotype -all 16 models with a determination coefficient from 0.607 to 0.973; in women endo-mesomorphic somatotype -14 models with a determination coefficient from 0.672 to 0.912. The most frequently constructed models included: women with mesomorphic somatotypecircumferential body dimensions (29.8%) and cephalometric indexes (19.1%); in women with ectomorphic somatotype body diameters (24.2%), body girth sizes (20.9%), cephalometric indices (19.8%) and thickness of skin and fat folds (14.3%); in women of the endo-mesomorphic somatotype, the cephalometric indexes (to the right kidney 24.2%, to the left kidney 15.6%), body diameters (to the right kidney 24.2%, to the left kidney 17.8%) and the circumferential body size (to the right kidney 24.2%, to left kidney 22.2%), and also only to the left kidney thickness of skin and fat folds (17.8%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In previous studies [4,31], we found that in practically healthy women of mesomorphic somatotypes of 16 possible sonographic parameters of the right and left kidneys, based on anthropometric and somatotypological indicators, were constructed 7 reliable models with a determination coefficient from 0.607 to 0.641, and for women endo-mesomorphic somatotype -14 valid models with a determination coefficient from 0.672 to 0.912. In women of mesomorphic somatotype constructed models most often include the circumferential dimensions of the body (29.8%) and cephalometric indices (19.1%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The regression models of sonographic sizes of the kidneys, depending on the peculiarities of anthroposomatotypological parameters of the body of practically healthy men of mesomorphic, ecto-mesomorphic and endomesomorphic somatotypes, as well as practically healthy women of mesomorphic, ectomorphic, endo-mesomorphic and mean intermediate somatotypes were constructed and presented by us in the previous publications [5][6][7][36][37][38]. To analyze the asymmetry of entering the regression models of sonographic sizes of the anthropo-somatotypological indicators, we took into account all constructed reliable models, and not only models with a determination coefficient of greater than 0.6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%