Modelling the effect of size on the aerial dispersal of microorganisms

Abstract

Aim We investigate the long‐standing question of whether the small size of microbes allows most microbial species to colonize all suitable sites around the globe or whether their ranges are limited by opportunities for dispersal. In this study we use a modelling approach to investigate the effect of size on the probability of between‐continent dispersal using virtual microorganisms in a global model of the Earth’s atmosphere. Location Global. Methods We use a computer model of global atmospheric circulation to investigate the effect of microbe size (effective diameters of 9, 20, 40 and 60 μm) on the probability of aerial dispersal. Results We found that for smaller microbes, once airborne, dispersal is remarkably successful over a 1‐year period. The most striking results are the extensive within‐hemisphere distribution of virtual microbes of 9 and 20 μm diameter and the lack of dispersal between the Northern and Southern Hemispheres during the year‐long time‐scale of our simulations. Main conclusions Above a diameter of 20 μm wind dispersal of virtual microbes between continents becomes increasingly unlikely, and it does not occur at all (within our simulated 1‐year period) for those of 60 μm diameter. Within our simulation, the success of small microbes in long‐distance dispersal is due both to their greater abundance and to their longer time in the atmosphere – once airborne – compared with larger microbes.

Measurements and modeling of surface–atmosphere exchange of microorganisms in Mediterranean grassland

“…Previous attempts to understand the distribution of PBAs in the atmosphere tended to simplify the surface-atmosphere transport both by deriving emissions from airborne concentrations (Burrows et al, 2009a) and by making ecosystem-wide assumptions about emissions (Bur-rows et al, 2009a;Hoose et al, 2010;Sesartic et al, 2012). Airborne concentrations are, nevertheless, variable, being the combined results of both emissive and depositional processes as well as atmospheric transport (Wilkinson et al, 2012). For this reason, we conceived the PLAnET model to estimate fluxes directly, while accounting for the underlying emission-deposition processes.…”

The biogeography of abundant and rare bacterioplankton in the lakes and reservoirs of China

“…These results indicate that the abundant bacteria with high local abundance have a decreased probability of local extinction and increase probability of dispersal, thereby resulting in a widespread or ubiquitous distribution. In fact, bacteria are of a size where long distance aerial dispersal is clearly possible (Wilkinson et al, 2012) and the more abundant taxa are presumably more likely to become airborneperhaps via bubble burst processes associated with wind-created waves (Hamilton and Lenton, 1998). In addition, the commoner taxa are also more likely to be moved by waterbirds that have been shown to affect the movement of some zooplankton between lakes (Figuerola et al, 2005).…”

ANaganishiain high places: functioning populations or dormant cells from the atmosphere?

“…Many microbes can be transported over global distances (Kellogg and Griffin 2006; Schlesinger et al 2006), and biogeographic patterns of microbial community structure suggest widespread long-distance dispersal at global scales (Barberán et al 2007, Darcy et al 2011; Itani and Smith 2016). Mathematical models of long-range transport also show that smaller particles – like spores – are likely to easily attain global distribution (Norros et al 2014, Wilkinson et al 2012). But not all microbes can survive aerial transport, since the atmosphere itself is an extreme environment with stressors including high UV radiation, extreme temperatures, and high potential for desiccation (Griffin et al 2001).…”