‘Moderate’ Islam in Western Counterterrorism Praxes: Countering Extremism or Coercing Negligence?

Abstract

Moderate Islam has been emphasised in Western counterterrorism praxes. In what ways are the Islamic perspective on moderation incorporated into these praxes? To explore this question, the paper adopts decoloniality as its analytical framework and uses an interdisciplinary approach combining Critical Security Studies and Islamic Studies. Relying on critical analyses of secondary counterterrorism discourses and practices as well as key primary Islamic sources, the paper explores the Islamic concept of wasaṭiyyah (moderation), which forms the foundation for promulgating ‘moderate Islam.’ In essence, moderation in Islam is positioned as the middle path between the two opposite margins of ghulūw (extremism) and ghaflah (negligence). Although moderation as understood through the Islamic perspective requires the maintenance of an impeccable balance between both margins, Western counterterrorism praxes place more weight on extremism (ghulūw). Such fragmental conceptualisation and application of moderation in Islam substantially diminishes its efficacy in mitigating terrorism and violent extremism.

How about a Green Caliphate?

“…At the same time, however, I found two major handicaps on the way to operationalizing an Islamic environmental vision: the persistence of nationalism and intra-Muslim rivalry. I have observed that intra-Muslim conflicts have intensified over the last few decades due to Western counterterrorism discourses and practices (Alkatiri 2018b, Mustapha 2021. Drawing on postcolonial theory and secularization theory, I have analyzed the colonial and domination practices of nation-states in both destroying the environment and marginalizing Muslims on cultural, political, and economic fronts (Alkatiri 2017b(Alkatiri , 2018a(Alkatiri , 2023.…”