2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moderators of the predictive efficacy of the Historical, Clinical and Risk Management-20 for aggression in psychiatric facilities: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
65
6
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
8
65
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst a small number of studies have incorporated self-harm incidents within outcomes categories for 'any aggression', a recent meta-analysis of the tool for inpatient aggression [13] could not examine predictive validity for self-harm due to an insufficient number of studies examining the behaviour as a distinct outcome. Those studies that have examined the predictive validity of the HCR-20 for self-harm in isolation have produced mixed results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whilst a small number of studies have incorporated self-harm incidents within outcomes categories for 'any aggression', a recent meta-analysis of the tool for inpatient aggression [13] could not examine predictive validity for self-harm due to an insufficient number of studies examining the behaviour as a distinct outcome. Those studies that have examined the predictive validity of the HCR-20 for self-harm in isolation have produced mixed results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Given that the efficacy of the HCR-20 for violence prediction (e.g. [13,17]), and the prevalence of self-harm [4], has been shown to vary across different clinical and demographic groups, its performance was also evaluated as a function of gender, diagnosis, age, and ethnicity. We also aimed to examine the predictive validity of the individual HCR-20 items, as their relative importance has the potential to inform summary judgements and risk-management plans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…concurrent) validumu tiriant kartu su kitais žinomais smurto rizikos vertinimo instrumentais (Penney et al, 2014;O'Shea et al, 2013;Strub et al, 2014). Pažymėtina, kad HCR-20 validumas dažniausiai buvo tiriamas teismo psichiatrijos pacientų populiacijoje (Jung et al, 2013), tačiau pastaruoju metu tyrimai vis dažniau apima ir kitas tikslines dalyvių grupes, pavyzdžiui, bendrosios psichiatrijos pacientus, pataisos įstaigose esančius nuteistuosius ir pan.…”
Section: įVadasunclassified
“…Pažymėtina, kad HCR-20 validumas dažniausiai buvo tiriamas teismo psichiatrijos pacientų populiacijoje (Jung et al, 2013), tačiau pastaruoju metu tyrimai vis dažniau apima ir kitas tikslines dalyvių grupes, pavyzdžiui, bendrosios psichiatrijos pacientus, pataisos įstaigose esančius nuteistuosius ir pan. Šių tyrimų rezultatai rodo, kad HCR-20 įverčiai yra stipriai susiję su teismo psichiatrijos pacientų pakartotiniu patekimu į teismo psichiatrijos įstaigą (Dolan, Khawaja, 2004), taip pat su smurtinio elgesio pasireiškimu ateityje tiek tarp teismo psichiatrijos pacientų (Chu et al, 2011;Gray et al, 2008;O'Shea et al, 2013), tiek ir tarp pataisos įstaigose esančių nuteistųjų (de Vogel, de Ruiter, 2006;Neves et al, 2011). Be to, kai kurių autorių duomenimis (Dahle, 2006;Gray et al, 2008), HCR-20 įverčiai gerai prognozuoja bendro ir nesmurtinio nusikalstamo elgesio pasireiškimą ateityje.…”
Section: įVadasunclassified
“…The HCR-20 has good predictive validity for future violence (Yang et al, 2010;Singh et al, 2011), including in the inpatient setting (Hogan et al, 2010;O'Shea et al, 2013). Investigation of its predictive validity for sexually violent behaviour has previously been subsumed under the broader category of aggression and has only been considered in a small number of studies (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%