1997
DOI: 10.1007/s004240050482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of rat brain Kv1.4 channel gating by association with accessory Kvβ1.1 and β2.1 subunits

Abstract: We have examined the effects of co-expression of Kvbeta1.1 and Kvbeta2.1 subunits on the gating of rat brain Kv1.4 channels, expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Expression of Kv1.4 subunits alone produced a rapidly inactivating "A" type current, which activated at potentials beyond -60 mV in a solution containing high levels of rubidium. Current activation curves obtained from tail current measurements were fitted with a Boltzmann function, with V1/2 = -47 mV and k = 10 mV. Neither the Kvbeta1.1 nor Kvbeta2.1 subuni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The expression of Kvβ3 mRNA is prominent only in the olfactory bulb and thalamic nuclei (Heinemann et al, 1995) ; thus, it is unlikely to be found in these samples. The auxiliary subunits have distinct functions : Kvβ1 confers rapid inactivation on noninactivating α subunits (Rettig et al, 1994 ; Heinemann et al, 1996), and Kvβ2.1 behaves as a chaperone for Kv1.2 (Rhodes et al, 1996) and modifies the gating of Kv1.4 (McCormack et al., 1995 ; McIntosh et al, 1997). It also affects the Kvβ1.1‐mediated K + ‐current inactivation (Xu and Li, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expression of Kvβ3 mRNA is prominent only in the olfactory bulb and thalamic nuclei (Heinemann et al, 1995) ; thus, it is unlikely to be found in these samples. The auxiliary subunits have distinct functions : Kvβ1 confers rapid inactivation on noninactivating α subunits (Rettig et al, 1994 ; Heinemann et al, 1996), and Kvβ2.1 behaves as a chaperone for Kv1.2 (Rhodes et al, 1996) and modifies the gating of Kv1.4 (McCormack et al., 1995 ; McIntosh et al, 1997). It also affects the Kvβ1.1‐mediated K + ‐current inactivation (Xu and Li, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K ϩ currents were recorded after 72 h, using a two-microelectrode voltage clamp amplifier (TEC-03; NPI) as described previously (26) during voltage steps to ϩ20 mV from a holding potential of Ϫ80 mV. DTX k was applied by superfusion (at a rate of 5 ml/min), and its concentration increased cumulatively.…”
Section: Electrophysiological and Biochemical Analysis Of Recombinantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, Kv 1 and Kv 3 subunits interact with the Kv1 family ofsubunits and induce rapid inactivation in all Kv1 channels [7,10,27,28], except Kv1.6 that has a NIP-an N-type inactivation prevention domain [29]. Kv 2 has no inactivation ball therefore it does not convert their partners into A-type channels although it can accelerate inactivation kinetics [30]. Generally, the -ball and theball do not have direct interactions [31] although they may share sequence homology as, for instance, the -balls of Kv 1 and Kv 3 with the -balls of Kv1.4 and Kv3.4.…”
Section: Ancillary Subunits Kv -Subunitsmentioning
confidence: 96%