2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05582-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified Broström procedure in patients with chronic ankle instability is superior to conservative treatment in terms of muscle endurance and postural stability

Abstract: Purpose To compare muscle strength, muscle endurance, and postural stability in both the affected and unaffected ankles between patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI) who underwent conservative treatment and those who underwent the modified Broström procedure (MBP). Methods A total of 67 patients (37, conservative treatment; 30, MBP) participated. Muscle strength and muscle endurance were measured using an isokinetic device, and postural stability was tested using a postural stabilometry system. We used… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on a previous study for postural stability in patients with ankle instability [25,34], an OSI difference > 0.5 between the groups was considered to represent a clinical difference. A power analysis was performed to determine the sample size, with an alpha level of 0.05 and a power of 0.8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a previous study for postural stability in patients with ankle instability [25,34], an OSI difference > 0.5 between the groups was considered to represent a clinical difference. A power analysis was performed to determine the sample size, with an alpha level of 0.05 and a power of 0.8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size calculation for the present study was based on a previous study of muscle strength in patients with lower extremity injuries, [19,22] and a muscle strength difference >10% between the groups was considered signi cant. To determine the sample size, we conducted a priori power analysis, with an alpha level of 0.05 and a power of 0.8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size calculation for this study was based on a previous study of muscle strength in patients with lower extremity injuries, [19,22] and a muscle strength difference > 10% between the groups was considered signi cant. To determine the sample size, we conducted an a priori power analysis, with an alpha level of 0.05, and a power of 0.8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%