2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2834-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified head-neck offset for diagnosing anterior femoro-acetabular impingement

Abstract: The new HNO is easier to measure, more reproducible and more accurate. A modified HNO <5 mm and a modified AOR <0.100 on the frog-leg view argued in favour of a pathological cam-type head-neck junction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. Selection of radiographs for reproducibility calculations should be via randomization or from a consecutive series of patients so as to minimize selection bias 23,31,34,35,43,44,46,53,54,56,60,62 12 (27.9%) 4. Review of radiographs at different time points for intrarater reliability tabulation should be separated by a minimum of 1 week [23][24][25][29][30][31][33][34][35][36]39,[41][42][43][44]46,52,54,55,[59][60][61][62][63]65,67 26 (81.3%)* 5. Order of images at the time of second viewing for the intrarater reliability tabulation should be randomized with respect to the initial order of viewing 23,25,29,31,[33][34][35]67 8 (25.0%)* 6.…”
Section: No Of Studies Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3. Selection of radiographs for reproducibility calculations should be via randomization or from a consecutive series of patients so as to minimize selection bias 23,31,34,35,43,44,46,53,54,56,60,62 12 (27.9%) 4. Review of radiographs at different time points for intrarater reliability tabulation should be separated by a minimum of 1 week [23][24][25][29][30][31][33][34][35][36]39,[41][42][43][44]46,52,54,55,[59][60][61][62][63]65,67 26 (81.3%)* 5. Order of images at the time of second viewing for the intrarater reliability tabulation should be randomized with respect to the initial order of viewing 23,25,29,31,[33][34][35]67 8 (25.0%)* 6.…”
Section: No Of Studies Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Order of images at the time of second viewing for the intrarater reliability tabulation should be randomized with respect to the initial order of viewing 23,25,29,31,[33][34][35]67 8 (25.0%)* 6. Reviewers operate independently of one another, blinded to the measurements/grades of other study participants 29,30,[32][33][34][35]37,39,41,[43][44][45][50][51][52]54,57,[60][61][62]64,66,67 23 (53.5%)…”
Section: No Of Studies Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation