2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.11.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified maximum tangential stress criterion for fracture behavior of zirconia/veneer interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In vitro work has shown that factors like thermocycling can affect the mechanical properties of zirconia [ 79 ]. These can be modulated by the geometric arrangement (such as thickness) of the zirconia dental appliances [ 80 ]. Therefore, depending on the clinical specifics of the case, material bulk mechanics should be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro work has shown that factors like thermocycling can affect the mechanical properties of zirconia [ 79 ]. These can be modulated by the geometric arrangement (such as thickness) of the zirconia dental appliances [ 80 ]. Therefore, depending on the clinical specifics of the case, material bulk mechanics should be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, a variety of fracture criteria are available in the literature to assess brittle fracture characteristics of materials. Three categories of criteria are used: energybased, [11][12][13][14][15] stress-based, [16][17][18][19][20] and strain-based [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] criteria. Each classification employs a different concept to describe the fracture mechanism and has intrinsic advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent studies have highlighted the importance of FEM analysis in clinical applications and the development of new prosthetic systems (Mirsayar and Park 2016;Mazaheri et al, 2016) and the use of innovative materials and surface treatments (Kumar et al, 2016). The methodological procedure is illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Compact Bonementioning
confidence: 99%