1997
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199709000-00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modular Bifurcation Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Abstract: This study suggests that endovascular prosthesis exclusion of AAAs using a self-expanding modular device may be effective in many patients who are otherwise surgical candidates for repair if further clinical studies confirm these observations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported incidence rate of endoleak varies widely (0% to 47%) and is dependent on multiple factors. 13,14 For a costeffectiveness analysis, the critical issue is the rate of reintervention for endoleak. Endoleaks that spontaneously seal generate no cost and presumably no morbidity.…”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported incidence rate of endoleak varies widely (0% to 47%) and is dependent on multiple factors. 13,14 For a costeffectiveness analysis, the critical issue is the rate of reintervention for endoleak. Endoleaks that spontaneously seal generate no cost and presumably no morbidity.…”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also have pioneered the use of transluminally placed endovascular grafts for the treatment of aneurysms and for traumatic and occlusive arterial lesions. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]…”
Section: Endovascular Interventions Training and Credentialing For Vascular Surgeonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The segmented body construction resulted in a flexible bifurcated graft for the full length of the stent graft and eliminated the stiff, unbending 5 cm-long proximal bifurcation segment. 9 All spiral and conventional CT scans of patients included in the study were performed with slice reconstruction at 3 or 5 mm. Changes of 10 mm or more in the distance between the lower renal artery and the first visible portion of the endograft on the axial reconstruction of the CT scan were defined as DM (Figs 1 to 3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%