Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Modularity 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2889443.2889445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modularity and optimization in synergy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Neverlang [13] framework permits changes to the interpreted language without regenerating its parser [25]. Changes can be introduced during the interpretation of the application both at system-wide level and localised on the application parse tree (PT) [20,26]. These Neverlang's characteristics allow -DSU to support dynamic language adaptation in two ways: i) by replacing language components and ii) by directly modifying how the language feature is interpreted.…”
Section: -Dsu Over Neverlangmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Neverlang [13] framework permits changes to the interpreted language without regenerating its parser [25]. Changes can be introduced during the interpretation of the application both at system-wide level and localised on the application parse tree (PT) [20,26]. These Neverlang's characteristics allow -DSU to support dynamic language adaptation in two ways: i) by replacing language components and ii) by directly modifying how the language feature is interpreted.…”
Section: -Dsu Over Neverlangmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in -DSU, language adaptation is just the matter of either replacing a slice or injecting a semantic action at a specific node of the PT whereas a method change corresponds to a PT rewriting. Both approaches are feasible and supported by Neverlang as explained in [20] and [26] respectively. Nonetheless, we consider the support of changes at in-language abstractions too complex with respect to the support provided by other DSUs (that do not support changes at linguistic abstractions as -DSU does) and we are still investigating how to limit this complexity before introducing in-language abstractions in -DSU .…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%