2019 IEEE 7th International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology (ICCSNT) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iccsnt47585.2019.8962418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation Recognition of Radar Signal Based on an Improved CNN Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figures 5 shows the confusion matrix of the CLSTM network at different SNR. From the figure, it can be seen that the network is poor in recognizing all modulated signals at low SNR, because the interference of noise blurred the features of IQ signals [15] ; At medium to high SNR, the recognition accuracy is high for all modulations except for modulations QAM16 and QAM64, AM-DSB and WBFM which are easily confused [16] . Therefore, the next step can be divided into two directions: First is to do data enhancement, noise reduction and other preprocessing on the original data to improve the feature extraction ability of the network at low SNR; Second is to enhance the intra-class recognition ability of the network to improve the discrimination effect of the network on the confused signals [17] .…”
Section: Recognition Effect Of Clstm Network With Different Snrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures 5 shows the confusion matrix of the CLSTM network at different SNR. From the figure, it can be seen that the network is poor in recognizing all modulated signals at low SNR, because the interference of noise blurred the features of IQ signals [15] ; At medium to high SNR, the recognition accuracy is high for all modulations except for modulations QAM16 and QAM64, AM-DSB and WBFM which are easily confused [16] . Therefore, the next step can be divided into two directions: First is to do data enhancement, noise reduction and other preprocessing on the original data to improve the feature extraction ability of the network at low SNR; Second is to enhance the intra-class recognition ability of the network to improve the discrimination effect of the network on the confused signals [17] .…”
Section: Recognition Effect Of Clstm Network With Different Snrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AirNN closely follows the bound of the software-based RQM-CNN, with a drop in accuracy of only 2%, and an overall drop w.r.t. Classic-CNN of 3.2% for the SNR range of [6,30] dB.…”
Section: Airnn Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) As a systems contribution, we implement a softwareframework to control the RIS network called AirNNOS that synchronizes and aligns start times of the relay transmitters and the receiver, as well as reconfigures the RIS on demand to change their reflection coefficients. (4) Given the measured error of the over-the-air convolution, we show through simulations that the experimentally derived analog convolution is accurate enough to run inference on trained neural networks, with an average deviation in testing accuracy of 3.2% for a range of medium-tohigh SNR of [6,30] dB compared to classical, GPU-based inference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Through the radar signal preprocessing and feature extraction of the convolutional neural network, the network can identify random overlapping radar signals under low SNR. Cai et al [ 9 ] proposed a radar signal modulation and recognition algorithm based on an improved CNN model. In this model, a dense connection block layer and a global pooling layer were added to identify 8 radar signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%