2007
DOI: 10.1002/dc.20629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and HPV infections in cervical samples with normal and abnormal cytopathological findings

Abstract: It has been suggested that Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and human papillomaviruses (HPV) co-infection could contribute to development of intraepithelial lesions. In this study, HPV and CT-DNA were investigated in 250 cervicovaginal samples of patients from Minas Gerais, Brazil. The cytological analysis revealed that 70% of samples (175) were negative, 5.2% (13) presented atypical squamous or glandular cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS/AGUS), 12.4% (31) presented low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
11
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important study carried out by Neves et al (2016) on asymptomatic women aged 14-25 years who used public health services in Manaus showed a prevalence of 13.1% for CT infections, whereas in women aged 20-25 years this prevalence was 10.8%, as determined by the Digene Hybrid Capture II Test (HCII CT-ID). Our results corroborate the prevalence range found in the rest of Brazil (9.1-14.3%) (de Paula et al, 2007;Oliveira et al, 2009;Benzaken et al, 2010;Piazzetta et al, 2011;Garcês et al, 2013). CT infection is asymptomatic in almost all women and, if left untreated, can progress to complications such as ectopic pregnancy, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), and tubal infertility (Golijow et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another important study carried out by Neves et al (2016) on asymptomatic women aged 14-25 years who used public health services in Manaus showed a prevalence of 13.1% for CT infections, whereas in women aged 20-25 years this prevalence was 10.8%, as determined by the Digene Hybrid Capture II Test (HCII CT-ID). Our results corroborate the prevalence range found in the rest of Brazil (9.1-14.3%) (de Paula et al, 2007;Oliveira et al, 2009;Benzaken et al, 2010;Piazzetta et al, 2011;Garcês et al, 2013). CT infection is asymptomatic in almost all women and, if left untreated, can progress to complications such as ectopic pregnancy, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), and tubal infertility (Golijow et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The prevalence of HPV in women with normal cytology was greater than the prevalence rates reported in the last ten years that range from 13 to 35% among women with normal cytology (Fedrizzi et al, 2008;Fernandes et al, 2009;Lippman et al, 2010;Oliveira et al, 2011;Castro et al, 2011;Rocha et al, 2014;Santos-Filho et al, 2016). Similarly, the rates of occurrence described for women with premalignant and malignant cervical lesions in the last 10 years were lower than those demonstrated in this study (de Paula et al, 2007;Paesi et al, 2009;Oliveira-Silva et al, 2011;Gurgel et al, 2013;Freitas et al, 2014). The most prevalent HR-HPV types were 16, 58, 33, and 31, both in the women with normal cytology and those with premalignant and malignant cervical lesions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Nevertheless, although several epidemiological studies have found a positive association between C. trachomatis-and HPV-related cervical lesions and cervical cancer, the specific relationship between infections by these micro-organisms and cervical neoplasia has not as yet been fully clarified. Moreover, the detection of C. trachomatis in HPV-positive samples has yielded contrasting results (Castle et al, 2003;de Paula et al, 2007;Lehtinen et al, 2011;Luostarinen et al, 2013;Naucler et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that the frequency of cellular changes, including RCC, was significantly greater in Chlamydia positive women than in uninfected women (74% versus 31%), consistent with previous reports. However, there are several studies showing no association or even a negative correlation between Chlamydia infection and the development of cervical lesions [16, 17, 23]. Thus, the role of Chlamydia infection as a risk factor in the development of cervical lesions is still controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%