1979
DOI: 10.6028/jres.084.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular interpretations of modulus and swelling relations in natural rubber cross-linked by dicumyl peroxide

Abstract: A survey of published experime ntal work on the modulus of natural rubber cross-linked by di c umyl peroxide permits a compari son with the results and molecular interpretation s obtained in recent NBS work [J . Res. NBS 76A, No.1, 51 (1972), 77A, No.1, 171 (1973) and BOA, No.3, 451 (1976]. Excelle nt agreement was found a mong values of the s hear mod ulus G at the sa me cross-linkin g when the cross-linking is calculated from the a mount of decomposed dic umyl peroxide. The types of de formation includ ed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be as a consequence of the number of added effective sub-chains calculation from the number of added cross-links. Taken together, this highlights the assumption that two effective sub-chains are equally with each added cross-link [87]. At this stage it is not possible to fully explain the gap between the values of cross-linking density, as it may arise both from the experimental procedure used to prepare the gels and from the intrinsic differences between the two models applied.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Cross-linking Density Determination Based On Two Different Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This may be as a consequence of the number of added effective sub-chains calculation from the number of added cross-links. Taken together, this highlights the assumption that two effective sub-chains are equally with each added cross-link [87]. At this stage it is not possible to fully explain the gap between the values of cross-linking density, as it may arise both from the experimental procedure used to prepare the gels and from the intrinsic differences between the two models applied.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Cross-linking Density Determination Based On Two Different Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%