“…Since then, due to the sheer size of the group, usually representative genera were selected for comparative studies to gain an overview on the whole Poodae and their major groupings using morphological data, plastid DNA restriction site analysis, traditional Sanger and, more recently, plastid genome sequencing (Soreng & Davis, ; Davis & Soreng, ; Döring & al., ; Quintanar & al., ; Soreng & al., ; Schneider & al., ; Saarela & al., , ; Pimentel & al., ; Orton & al., ). Other studies focused on special groups using an in‐depth sampling of taxa, for example, within traditional Aveneae (Grebenstein & al., ; Döring, ; Saarela & al., , ; Wölk & Röser, , ; Barberá & al., ) and Poeae (Schneider & al., ; Birch & al., , ), in which especially the subtribes Poinae (Hunter & al., ; Gillespie & Soreng, ; Gillespie & al., , , , , ; Refulio‐Rodríguez & al., ; Hoffmann & al., ; Soreng & al., , ; Nosov & al., , ), Loliinae (Torrecilla & Catalán, , Catalán & al., , ; Torrecilla & al., ; Inda & al., ; Cheng & al., ; Minaya & al., ), Sesleriinae (Kuzmanović & al., ), Brizinae and Calothecinae (Essi & al., ; Persson & Rydin, ; Silva & al., ) were studied.…”