1998
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1997.0485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Phylogeny and Evolutionary Divergence of North American Biological Species ofArmillaria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Swofford (1991), quoted in Farris et al (1994), states that the ILD test is not influenced by different levels of homoplasy within the matrices but that it should be; Vidal and Lecointre (1998) agree that it is not influenced by noise, but they follow Farris et al (1994) in believing that it should not be; Graham et al (1998) come to the conclusion that it is in fact influenced by noise and offer advice on how to solve this problem (by excluding poorly supported branches). Other authors make the observation during their work that some significant results in the test may be due to a noisy or small data set, or one which lacks the ability to fully resolve trees, without addressing the issue further (for example Cannatella et al, 1998;Piercey-Normore et al, 1998). This is clearly an unsatisfactory position.…”
Section: The Influence Of Noise On the Ild Testmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For example, Swofford (1991), quoted in Farris et al (1994), states that the ILD test is not influenced by different levels of homoplasy within the matrices but that it should be; Vidal and Lecointre (1998) agree that it is not influenced by noise, but they follow Farris et al (1994) in believing that it should not be; Graham et al (1998) come to the conclusion that it is in fact influenced by noise and offer advice on how to solve this problem (by excluding poorly supported branches). Other authors make the observation during their work that some significant results in the test may be due to a noisy or small data set, or one which lacks the ability to fully resolve trees, without addressing the issue further (for example Cannatella et al, 1998;Piercey-Normore et al, 1998). This is clearly an unsatisfactory position.…”
Section: The Influence Of Noise On the Ild Testmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…13,14) Methods based on molecular techniques are nowadays routinely used and provided a new perspective for phylogenetic and taxonomic studies. 12,[15][16][17] PCR-RFLP analysis profiles of intergenic spacer 1 (IGS-1) have been successfully applied to the Armillaria species identification. 12,13,18,19) Sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and intergenic spacer 1 (IGS-1) regions 14,20,21) has also been used for identification.…”
Section: 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the morphological and genetic relatedness of these two species, the relatively small geographic range of A. calvescens, and results from phylogenetic analyses, researchers have hypothesized that A. calvescens is derived from A. gallica (Anderson & Stasovski 1992;Piercey-Normore et al 1998). Separating these two species from one another using both morphological and molecular techniques have proven to be difficult, yet important to fully understand the ecology of Armillaria in northeastern North America where these two species dominate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%