2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular phylogeny of the extinct giant deer, Megaloceros giganteus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
70
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
10
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phylogenetic position of the giant deer, based on mtDNA sequences (Lister et al, 2005;Hughes et al, 2006), is closest to extant Dama species. Since the giant deer is extinct, we based our comparative evaluation on the antler development of extant cervids, especially Dama dama.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The phylogenetic position of the giant deer, based on mtDNA sequences (Lister et al, 2005;Hughes et al, 2006), is closest to extant Dama species. Since the giant deer is extinct, we based our comparative evaluation on the antler development of extant cervids, especially Dama dama.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphological (Breda, 2005), paleoecological (Van der Made and Tong, 2008;Chritz et al, 2009), paleobiogeographical (Stuart et al, 2004), evolutionary (Vislobokova, 2012), and phylogenetic (Lister et al, 2005;Hughes et al, 2006;Van der Made and Tong, 2008) studies, among others, of giant deer have been published. However, morphological reports have not included the histological detail of normal and pathological antler tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After incubation with gentle agitation for 1 h at 37°C, 1 mg/ml proteinase K was added to the sample, followed by incubation at 50°C for 2 h. Throughout the procedure, a blank extraction treated identically to the experimental samples was included to monitor potential contamination during the DNA extraction process. Finally, the samples were centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 5 min, and the supernatants were extracted using phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:24:1) for organic extraction (Hughes et al 2006;Maniatis et al 1989;Muñoz et al 2012a). Subsequently, the aqueous phase was concentrated by precipitation via the addition of 0.1 volumes of 3 M sodium acetate pH 5.0 and 2.5 volumes of ethanol.…”
Section: Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA was extracted using a phenol/chloroform protocol (Hughes et al, 2006). Each tooth was first reduced to powder.…”
Section: Ancient Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%