2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecularly Imprinted Polymer as an Antibody Substitution in Pseudo-immunoassays for Chemical Contaminants in Food and Environmental Samples

Abstract: The chemical contaminants in food and the environment are quite harmful to food safety and human health. Rapid, accurate, and cheap detection can effectively control the potential risks derived from these chemical contaminants. Among all detection methods, the immunoassay based on the specific interaction of antibody-analyte is one of the most widely used techniques in the field. However, biological antibodies employed in the immunoassay usually cannot tolerate extreme conditions, resulting in an unstable stat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The binding assay relies on the nonlinearity of the theophylline binding isotherm of the MIP [ 21 ]. Many other MIP binding assays have been developed since the cited pioneering work [ 22 , 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Selectivity In Various Mip Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding assay relies on the nonlinearity of the theophylline binding isotherm of the MIP [ 21 ]. Many other MIP binding assays have been developed since the cited pioneering work [ 22 , 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Selectivity In Various Mip Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These binding sites are complementary to the targeted analytes in size, shape, and functional groups, so to possess specific recognition ability and improve the selectivity and the detection efficacy (Komasawa, Ueki, Kaminoh, & Nishi, 2010). Besides the high affinity to targets, other unique superiorities of MIPs, namely good chemical stability, physical robustness, easy preparation and low cost, have been spotlighted to be an ideal alternative to biological receptor (i.e., antibodies and enzymes) in many fields, including sample pretreatment (Chen, Xu, & Li, 2011), immunoassays (Chen et al, 2018), biomimetic catalysis (Menger et al, 2016) and so on. Especially, in biological/chemical sensing field (Yang et al, 2018), MIPs have been turned out to be a hotspot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is more, this material can be synthesized within several days, and can be recycled dozens of times. Therefore, there have been many articles reporting the use of MIPs as recognition elements to develop various analytical methods for the detection of different analytes, such as electrochemical sensor, pseudoimmunoassay and flow‐injection CL method . Previously, there have been some papers reporting the synthesis of MIPs for PYs, but most of the reported MIPs are used as absorbents to develop different sample extraction methods, and only two of these have been used as recognition reagents to prepare CL methods for detection of PYs …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%